I am envisioning a very big planet that at the equator Is mostly composed of gases. Further away from the equator a crusts forms of matter - rocks that then also contains an ocean. I am still imagining magma forming under the crusts There are continents only at the poles. I am no scientist and don't have a knowledge what sort of dynamics would play here: processes happening, biochemistry, - will the gravity change? How is a core between a rocky planet and gas planet different? Under what conditions can this type of planet exist? Will this be theoretically possible?
-
$\begingroup$ "at the equator Is mostly composed of gases. Further away from the equator a crusts forms of matter". The gas at the equator will naturally flow -- via gravity -- over the whole planet. $\endgroup$– RonJohnCommented Aug 29, 2018 at 18:19
-
$\begingroup$ as long as rocks are more dense than gas (and they usually are), gravity will eventually force the rocks into a ball, and the process will cause too much volcanic activity to sustain life. Similarly, gas will always form a ball around whatever is inside of it. The hourglass shape of rock is possible in small asteroids (so gravity is too weak), or in a rapidly spinning body (centripetal force will counter the gravity, but it will also blow the gas off the planet). Your setting could be an artificial construct, but it will start to collapse once forces holding it together are gone. $\endgroup$– Bald BearCommented Aug 29, 2018 at 18:28
3 Answers
Planets don't work like that, unless you declare them as a magic / fantasy planets.
Every object has a mass, and mass creates a gravitational force towards its center. That means any rock of your planet would fall towards the center of gravity, thereby forming a round, rocky core. If there are heavier elements in your planet (like iron), they would flow into the very center of the planet. By the way, that's exactly what happened on Earth.
The heat inside the planet melts your rocky core into magma, while the surface cools down, solidifying the magma to rock again. You now have a solid surface all around your planet.
Above the solid surface follows water, since it's less dense than rock. It would flow as deep as possible (towards the center of gravity), forming oceans. All that is then covered by the gasses, forming the atmosphere.
If you "cut" a giant chunk out of the equator to form something like your proposed planet, the following happens:
- The center of gravity is still in the very center of the planet.
- The massive continents, including their oceans, would fall towards the center of gravity with unbelievably high energy and collide at the core
- The energy of this collision would melt all of the rock, probably even expelling huge amounts of matter into space
- The molten remains of your planet would again arrange themselfs in order of their heavyness, thereby forming a smaller planet (since you cut out a chunk), but still a spherical one.
You'd need a world that was essentially shaped like an hourglass, with the bulbs being rock and the atmosphere wrapped around the waist. At any size that one would want to live on it that's not at all a natural form. An arbitrarily advanced civilisation could build such a world as a mega-engineering project but it's not a naturally occurring object.
Rocks (and thus magma) are denser than any gas.
Since it's a geologically active planet, it will tend to round itself out, with slightly more density at the equator.
The larger your planet, the smaller the mountains on its surface. Anything as large as or larger than the tiniest of dwarf planets could never have a giant pair of cliffs ringing its equator that go down to its core.
Vesta is the largest body that isn't a dwarf planet, and is the most like what you describe: mostly round, but with a huge, global deformation. (It was once a dwarf planet; successfully cooling to the right shape, but was struck after it cooled and wasn't able to re-round itself.)