# Sections of the universe made of anti matter

Is it possible to have giant sections of the universe made of antimatter? If so, what would the borders between matter and antimatter look like?

• The boundary would look very empty, except for the tons of residual gamma radiation. Also remember that every stray antihydrogen atom you hit on your way across the antimatter zone will annihilate one of your protons (think of a continual nuclear explosion all over your front-facing surfaces). – 2012rcampion Mar 8 '15 at 23:23
• Answers here would be from informed hobbyist, and (worse) upvoted for entertainment value. You should ask on physics exchange instead, to get real answer (reviewed by physicists). – Peter M. - stands for Monica Mar 9 '15 at 13:11
• Mandatory XKCD: what-if.xkcd.com/114. – The Square-Cube Law Mar 5 '19 at 19:48

## 4 Answers

Ah, you've hit upon the famous problem of baryon asymmetry, or, to put it in English, why there appears to be more matter than anti-matter in the universe. Neither the standard model of particle physics, nor the theory of general relativity provides an obvious explanation as to why that is the case.

Antimatter galaxies, if they exist, are expected to have the same chemistry and absorption and emission spectra as normal-matter galaxies, and their astronomical objects would be observationally identical, making them difficult to distinguish. So how could we can tell them apart...

Well, antimatter and matter tend to celebrate each of their meetings with very spectacular gamma-ray fireworks. If a lone galaxy or lone galaxy cluster were made of antimatter, observing the fireworks upon the boundary would be academic (easy). Astronomers have not yet made such observations. Ergo, no visible part of our accessible light-cone appears to be made out of anti-matter.

Now a more interesting interpretation of the problem is to state that anti-matter is merely time-reversed regular matter. For instance, in the Feynmann diagram below (time arrow is left to right), we can either interpret it as an electron and an anti-electron annihilating each other, or (time-reversed) as an electron receiving a giant energy package and turning backwards in time. If you accept this interpretation, the question of where all the antimatter in the big bang went off to becomes trivial -- in the other time-direction -- as if there were two light-cones emanating from the big bang instead of one. So anti-matter aliens about 28.6 billion years ago might be wondering where all the matter might be hiding.

Having antimatter pockets in vast reaches of the universe would mean that on the edges there would be a lot of matter-antimatter annihilation. That annihilation would create very strong gamma radiation which would be capable of blowing away other matter and antimatter from the border; basically, the border might clean itself. If the uniform pockets were really large (say tens of billions of lightyears across), repeated mixing could take a lot of time to start. From within the pocket, though, it might seem as if the whole sky was on fire tens of billions of years ago, like a kind of background radiation.

• Why would there be annihilation on the edges (assuming there were edges, which there aren't in our universe)? – HDE 226868 Mar 9 '15 at 21:34
• I was going for a post "upvoted for entertainment value" :) But anyway.. if you envision an infinite universe (which ours might be) and postulate that there are regions with relative abundance of matter (like ours) or antimatter, then where the two regions border, there would likely be a transition in the relative quantities of matter and antimatter. These would go through annihilation, maybe on cosmic timescales. It would be an interesting show to watch. – zdropic Mar 10 '15 at 10:03
1. Matter and antimatter are straightfoward : Both can form atoms, both have gravity and can interact gravitationally.
2. Antimatter can form suns just like matter, and generate photons from such suns just like matter. If a galaxy was made of antimatter, we could hardly detect this from our planet, because the light given out by such galaxy would be made of pretty standard photons just like our own galaxy.
3. Matter and antimatter interaction happens via anihilation. If a particle of matter touches a particle of antimatter, both are destroyed and gamma rays are released in a large ammount.

This means that, besides the exceptional case of two galaxies, one made of matter and the other made of anti-matter, colliding in a expetacular series of anihilation explosions, we could barely detect that a distant galaxy is made out of antimatter, as we could not detect anything unusual from it.

• There is no antiphoton? – Jetscooters Mar 8 '15 at 23:50
• The anti-particle of a photon is a photon. Some particles are their own anti-particles. Thats the case of photons. So, anti-matter produces photons all the same. – Jorge Aldo Mar 9 '15 at 0:16
• Very interesting! – Jetscooters Mar 9 '15 at 0:20
• Actually I have a feeling some analysis has been done on this (although I don't know what/how) and shown that our universe is virtually all regular matter. Might be worth checking out that research to see how they could tell. – Tim B Mar 9 '15 at 9:21

Since the observable matter appears to lie along a plane, what if the anti-matter is concentrated along an axis perpendicular to that plane? If the concentration of anti-matter was great enough, then the anti-matter would only be detectable by the effects it has on observable matter. Also, being separated from matter would preclude annihilation. It could be that during the big bang annihilation occurred in most regions of a spherical explosion except the plane of the observable universe and some other region separated by a considerable distance. If that distance is great enough, then the anti-matter would not be observable. Just food for thought.

• Observable matter is actually spread around us in all directions. We have trouble looking at far away matter in the plane of our galaxy, but otherwise we got two ginormous domes of universe to look at towards our north and south. – The Square-Cube Law Mar 5 '19 at 20:05
• Welcome to the site Don Wilcox, please take the tour and read up in our help centre about how we work: How to Answer – A Rogue Ant. Mar 5 '19 at 20:21