My hero is western tween born to rich emigres from fictional country, inspired by Romania. His parents escaped in the west, before demonstrators toppled the regime and took quite a wealth with them.

The tween is mysteriously transported in time, back in the late 70's, where the secret police arrests him, and due to his physical resemblance, they bring him to his grandfather, the feared chancellor.

The tween tells his grandfather that in a decade or so, Warsaw pact will fail and the mob will hang the regime including him for all the atrocities they've committed. The grandfather believes him, but tells him to keep quiet, the regime must control the population.

The tween suggests using the Chinese social score system to decrease number of atrocities.

Basically government keeps a credit score on every citizen which is decided by the actions of you and your friends and family.

If you do things that government considers good it goes up. On the other hand if you listen foreign radio stations, protest, distribute anti-government literature etc it goes down.

Also if you keep company with low rating people they will drag down your rating. And if your family are rebellious types, you either reform them or report their every move to keep yourself in government good graces.

People with high ratings have perks such as better medical care, access to credit, faster bureaucratic procedures, bonus points on university entry exams etc.

People with low ratings are punished by banning them to buy trains, they're queued lowed for medical care, can't by anything on credit, limited at number of jobs they could hold , limited at education opportunities etc.

The main idea is that people will self police themselves, so people will ostracize troublemakers with low ratings, doing the secret police dirty work to keep their perks.

Could social score system be implemented without internet and with IT technology from the late 70's?

  • 12
    $\begingroup$ Actual Romanian here, actually lived in the specified timeframe. What makes you believe that this wasn't actually the case? It was not called "social score", it was called "dossier", but the rest matches. The only element you missed is "social origin" -- "healthy social origin" means descended from poor people, and contributes to a good dossier. Good dossier -- advancement opportunities, good tickets to a seaside resort, accelerated allocation of a car. Bad dossier -- hard life. Yes, people self-censored. Atrocities were rare, at least from the 1960s to the early 1980s. $\endgroup$ – AlexP Jun 7 '18 at 21:19
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ The element of innovation in the proposed Chinese social score system is not the social score in itself -- this exists in all countries; in capitalist countries it's called "credit score", in Communist countries it's called "dossier", but it's the same thing. What the Chinese bring new is using modern IT to extend the elements captured in the dossier to all aspects of life, and to make the score available to a very wide set of service providers. This was necessary because China functions as a market economy, and the traditional Communist centralized "cadre department" was not enough. $\endgroup$ – AlexP Jun 7 '18 at 21:27
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Dossiers were not kept for everyone; they were generated when needed (e.g., a person applies for a promotion, or wants to enter certain sensitive schools), and then kept and updated when needed again. This was the task of the Cadre Department of the Communist Party. As for how they knew who were buddies, I'll tell you a joke from those days. Joke: What is a Romanian? A thief. What are two Romanians? Two thieves. What are three Romanians? Two thieves and an informer. Realistically, they knew because (to quote a poem) the Party is in everything, in those which are and in those which are not. $\endgroup$ – AlexP Jun 7 '18 at 21:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ TenAli, do you want to rewrite your question? If no, @AlexP might as well turn his first comment into an answer. $\endgroup$ – Mołot Jun 7 '18 at 21:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree with @Mołot. This sounds like it's been answered. Paper (or similar) filing systems may be inefficient compared to relational databases and the Internet, but the world used them with considerable (and often devestating) effectiveness for hundreds if not thousands of years. Human governments have been keeping tabs on its population since, well... forever and such files have been the staple of conspiracy/espionage stories almost as long. $\endgroup$ – JBH Jun 7 '18 at 23:17

In non socialist nations and throughout history, there was a "social score", which was an informal system of rating people by their behaviours and actions compared to the somewhat arbitrary social norms of the society by their own peers and community members.

People could be ranked based on their real and apparent wealth (and attempts to change your ranking on that scale could see you derided as "Nouveau Riche" or a social climber (depending on who was rating you). The expression "Keeping up with the Joneses" also describes that sort of behaviour.

Other expressions common in Western society also are ways of applying social rating to people. Coming from "the wrong side of the tracks" or "the bad side of town" also implies social and economic class and behaviour from people from there. "That kind of girl/boy" describes an individual against a moral framework, and other kinds of descriptors can also be described.

The real lesson here is people will pretty much instinctively create and use some sort of social credit system to rate others. The primary difference in Communist/Socialist/Fascist states in the past was there were severe legal consequences to not having a good "social rating". The primary issue with the current concept as the Chinese government seems to want to apply it is the ratings and consequences can be automated, done in real time and the data bank is national, not just implicit in the memories and behaviours of people in your town or community.

If the social credit system being implemented in your fictional world is to work, the "social norms" which people are being measured against will have to be considered carefully by the central authorities, and the implementation will have to be through social cues and stigmas (much like you would not want to be associated with someone from "the wrong side of the tracks") to drive behaviours towards what is being deemed "proper" and "normal".

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I disagree that having "bad score" in premodern societies did not have legal consequences. If you had bad score it would you be the one accused of witchcraft and hung from the nearest tree, the one to be jailed when someone goes missing, your crimes would be punished harder, anyone employing you would be shunned by the community... $\endgroup$ – SJuan76 Jun 8 '18 at 13:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.