2
$\begingroup$

So, out in Den Colorado many slavers make profits from buying and selling human slaves. The often prey on small tribes and settlements, like Boulder and Five Families. The slavers ride into town, take some people, and then leave, with those people captured subjected to unimaginable suffering as a slave. There is one thing in my plot that doesn’t make sense, however. What would be a plausible reason why the people in these towns wouldn’t try to fight back?

$\endgroup$

closed as primarily opinion-based by Aify, StephenG, L.Dutch, Mark Olson, JBH May 28 '18 at 3:25

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Maybe they do, and they fail. Maybe the slavers are better armed and organized. Maybe the slaves are actually sold to the slavers by the chiefs of the tribes. Maybe this is simply how it is -- remember than in most of the world for most of history slavery was a perfectly normal station in life. $\endgroup$ – AlexP May 27 '18 at 22:03
  • $\begingroup$ This is too broad by far. Real stories of this kind exist as far back as recorded history goes (e.g. the Roman empire was both victim and perpetrator). The reasons are complex and many. $\endgroup$ – StephenG May 27 '18 at 22:32
4
$\begingroup$

Combination of factors.

1: They stand to profit by selling their own criminals and captured enemies or assorted other undesirables to the slavers.

2: They own slaves, and a good number of those slaves come from..... you guessed it. The slavers.

3: Cultures change over time. We consider slavery reprehensible now (not enough to stop using Cambodian toddlers to make all our stuff but I digress). Owning slaves is entirely accepted in the post apocalyptic culture. It's a profitable way to build large things cheaply in with little to no industrial capability.

4: Slavers are respected, working for them is a very profitable opportunity everyone aspires to, its a fast track to wealth and power.

5: The slavers are smarter than one dimensional cartoon villains and don't mindlessly attack allies cuz "WE SLAVERS! WE BAD! FIGHT YOU NOW!" They operate like the Colombian narco-lords. They provide services and charity to their people, they act as a de facto police and government in a time where there is little or no social cohesion. Slavery becomes the punishment for most serious crimes, giving a crude sort of justice system to the wasteland. They make allies, cultivate friendships, do brisk business, and always ensure their neighbors have the right balance of fear, respect, admiration, and dependency to never think of attacking. But lastly and most importantly, they cant sell slaves to people if they get a reputation as mindless violent idiots and kill or enslave potential customers.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

In the early days of Africans being taken into slavery by Europeans, often the local West African rulers would sell their prisoners of war (rather than their own people) to the slavers. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/africa_caribbean/africa_trade.htm

The people of Boulder & Five Families might (whether openly or under the table) use the slavers as a way to get rid of their "undesirables" -- petty criminals, social rejects, etc.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Very good point. The "Roots" myth, that Europeans would make land at a random piece of rocky coast, then set of into a jungle they were totally unfamiliar with and unprepared for, to capture a group of skilled Bantu warriors on their home turf as if they were wild game, is totally implausible. Slavers bought their wares wholesale in markets, without risking their own previous skins. $\endgroup$ – pojo-guy May 28 '18 at 12:55
3
$\begingroup$

People pay protection money to the slavers. Those who don't pay are the ones collected.

People don't need to fight back as long as they are paid up......

Like every sort of criminal organization, a protection racket is a great source of income with a low level of work required.

The slavers hit the town taking a few every so often. After awhile someone comes into town offering protection from the slavers for a price.

Eventually, those who don't pay up are actively targeted for slavery. The remaining townsfolk feel it's cheaper to pay than fight as the slavers have stated they kill burn the town and kill everyone that resists and enslave everyone else should they try and rebel.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A very (maybe too) succinct answer, which has been flagged as low quality due to short length. Would you mind beefing it up a bit? Perhaps explain how your scenario developped; how it's maintained; etc. $\endgroup$ – elemtilas May 28 '18 at 1:35
3
$\begingroup$

If you're set on the idea of slave raids (as opposed to the slavers buying or extorting people from their settlements), consider making them stealthier. Slavers are basically predators, after all, and when falling on herds predators always single out the weak and isolated. Now weak victims don't make all that useful of slaves, so logic dictates they'll go after people who are alone or in small groups - tending the outlying fields, say, or on journeys to other villages. Each settlement has a fortified core that can repel slaver raids, but sooner or later somebody has to take a chance and venture further out.

Alternatively, what if they bring back indentured servitude? In a society like this, most people are going to be spending most of their time performing manual labor anyway, so doing it for someone else isn't that big of a change, and it can be safer working under the thumb of a domineering landlord than taking your chances as a subsistence farmer. Depending on the circumstances, your lot in life might actually improve. ("It sucks having to do what Mr. Johnson says, but at least there's clean water and no dire coyotes.") There's no need for raids and corrals and guards if the slaves volunteered.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

They fought back a generation ago and it did not end well. At all. Better that a few suffer rather than all of them like before.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.