Would it be possible to "green" the Saharan desert, given near future technology If so what things might have to be done, what kind of plants or bio engineered plants and animals would be introduced? Would dropping chunks of comets from orbit work to provide rain?

  • $\begingroup$ Doesn't sound like worldbuilding to me. You probably ought to start your own research by reading Wikipedia's page on desertification. $\endgroup$ – StephenG May 14 '18 at 0:44
  • $\begingroup$ Just to be clear... are you wanting to green the ENTIRE Sahara? or just part of it? $\endgroup$ – Blade Wraith May 14 '18 at 8:26
  • $\begingroup$ An old friend of mine once said, "given enough time and money anything is possible." Frankly, producing highly efficient desalination would be much more economical than redirecting (and slowing down... really slowing down) comets and simply adding water will solve the problem if you have enough time to wait for the plants to grow on their own. What are your constraints? What is the tech level? time requirement? end-goal of the effort? Must animal life be preserved? Are we ignoring political issues? Can we recraft the landscape to form new lakes and rivers? Etc. $\endgroup$ – JBH May 23 '18 at 5:44

Dropping chunks of comets is a bit extreme, but a source of water is much closer at hand: the Nile. The Aswan High Dam will eventually directly or indirectly cause water to spill into the Qatar Depression, creating an even greater artificial lake than Lake Nasser.

enter image description here

Qattara Depression Project

The Qattara Depression Project as originally envisioned would have water flow from the Mediterranean Sea into the depression, but using fresh water from the Nile would eliminate many issues cause by using salt water for the project. The water flowing from the Nile into the depression can be harnessed for hydro power, for industry or to desalinate sea water from the Mediterranean Sea, and the large area of the new lake would absorb solar energy, changing the micro climate, as well as evaporating and creating the basis for more rain in the region.

A different source of water would be to dam the Congo river (one of the various unlikely proposals going with "Atlantropa project"

enter image description here

Damming the Congo and creating inland seas. What could possibly go wrong....

Longer term (centuries), water will seep from the bottom of the new lake, and charge underground aquifers over a much larger area. Current oasis will expand, and older ones which had dried up will be revived, providing the nuclei for further greening, even without human intervention.

Some things that people can do to speed up the process is to plant fast growing grasses and other vegetation along the edges where lakes or oasis are growing to stabilize the soil, and manage the introduction of microfauna (bacteria and fungi) which will further bond to the particles of sand and help speed up the conversion process into new soil.

Either of these projects is geoengineering on an unprecedented scale, and the possibility of unanticipated effects overwhelming the initial goals of the project are about 100% (the biggest variable is what the effects of the new micro climate over northern Africa will actually be). Of the two, the Qattara Depression Project is likely more feasible (for certain definitions of feasible), although probably still outside the scale and scope of human engineering projects for a while yet.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ooo, I've never heard of the The Qattara Depression Project before. Wouldn't that just create another Salton Sea? $\endgroup$ – Pink Sweetener May 14 '18 at 2:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe the Aral Sea is a more apt comparison, since there should be a constant influx of water to replace the evaporated water. With proper management and active control, the system should achieve some sort of homeostasis . $\endgroup$ – Thucydides May 15 '18 at 1:11
  • $\begingroup$ Heh, you mean the Aral Sea used to be a more apt comparison. Not much of an influx anymore. $\endgroup$ – Pink Sweetener May 15 '18 at 1:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ True, which illustrates how difficult it is to communicate complex ideas in this format. I understand there are several projects to revive the Aral sea, including increasing the input via agricultural improvements upstream, and using dams across the seabed to prioritize where the water is stored. $\endgroup$ – Thucydides May 15 '18 at 1:57

This is one of many very dangerous suggestions put forward by "geoengineering" enthusiasts. As Mark Olson notes, the Sahara was indeed once a lot greener than it is today. In fact, it's still growing! Terrifying, right? There are efforts to stop desertification (as Tim B II discusses), usually involving planting very hardy vegetation in order to stop erosion and create the necessary ecosystem functions to retain water. Interestingly enough, however, a plan to completely forest the Sahara, as you propose, could lead to the destruction of the Amazon rainforest, which is fertilized by 22,000 tons of phosphorus blown from the north African desert every year, alllll the way across the Atlantic!


While I agree with Mark's answer, it should be noted that there are companies Converting the Sahara to farmland now, as we speak. Also, both Israel and Ethiopia have water management plans in place aimed directly at converting desert areas into arable land for farming purposes. None of these 3 real world modern examples have used comets, but they have used water in ways that preserve and reuse this precious resource.

This (ultimately) is the way to change a desert; the key is water. Deserts look like they do because there's no water there. Add water, and over time the sand becomes soil and plants begin their slow march into the space. Of course, we can accelerate that process, but the secret is and has always been water. Whether you divert existing fresh water sources, or desalinate existing seawater, once you have the resource, you can use it at the periphery of the desert and let the vegetation solve the problem for you if you wish.

Accelerating that natural process is more complicated of course because plants as they grow, die and decay add nutrients to the soil that allow for the next generation to grow faster and more reliably. Acceleration means providing those nutrients faster, and probably seeing the sand with topsoil as well so that it can be used by plants faster, but essentially vegetation on Earth is prolific and will solve the problem for you in time, given enough water.

When you think about it, that makes perfect sense; plants are constantly being eaten by other things; if they weren't this prolific, they wouldn't survive. So, in that sense, the fact that they form the primary food source for us all, even feeding the animals we eat, means that they are evolved to grow as voraciously as possible in ideal circumstances. Water just provides that ideal circumstance.


The Sahara was substantially greener just a few thousand years ago -- North Africa was a breadbasket for the Romans. And a few thousand years before that was the wonderfully named Neolithic Subpluvial when it was green and supported a rich assemblage of life.

So, add water and a bit of time to recreate soil and you have a Green Sahara.

I doubt that moving comets is optimal. I strongly suspect that pumping large amounts water from the Mediterranean into depressions and creating large (salt) lakes would by evaporation add enough water to the atmosphere to increase rainfall.

Since some theorize that the Sahara was formed by neolithic herders moving in and converting the vegetation to scrub which then started a vicious cycle leading to desert, it's possibly that careful re-vegetation of the region using desalinated water might produce a stable wetter climate.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.