1
$\begingroup$

In future, before the destruction of the solar system, Humans have found a planet with mineral and element composition exactly like earth and they want to transfer all they need from earth to it, but it is very far from the star it's orbiting so that the star is too dim to be like the sun for earth. What can they do to increase energy received by planet from the star (and only the star)? They can't change the planet's orbit.

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Mołot, L.Dutch - Reinstate Monica, wetcircuit, Frostfyre, kingledion Jan 31 '18 at 13:15

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "properties exactly like earth?" Your planet has a different orbit and is very different from Earth. $\endgroup$ – IEW Jan 31 '18 at 1:06
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ If the planet is Earth like but lacks energy (light and heat from its star) then it's NOT earth like. For one, you have no liquid water. No liquid water, no earth like life. You can't just melt ice and put plants in the ground; there'd be no bacterial activity in the soil. Could you please clarify? $\endgroup$ – Tim B II Jan 31 '18 at 1:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Does the energy absolutely have to come from the star? $\endgroup$ – Spencer Jan 31 '18 at 1:12
  • $\begingroup$ I mean the minerals and elements on it. Yes only from the star $\endgroup$ – Nemexia Jan 31 '18 at 7:42
  • $\begingroup$ Please note that you can notify one user per comment using the '@<username>' syntax. $\endgroup$ – Frostfyre Jan 31 '18 at 13:05
7
$\begingroup$

Mirrors at Lagrangian points L4 and L5

Put out a public tender in accordance with all the applicable norms and regulations of the Inter-World Bank, Inter-Stellar Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Star Federation, and contract a suitably chosen multistellar corporation to build two gigantic mirrors, complete with station keeping and orientation control mechanisms, to place them at the Lagrangian points L4 and L5, and to operate and maintain them for 2 millennia, with the possibility of extending the opearation and maintenance contract in successive 1 millennium increments.

The mirrors will collect starlight and reflect it onto the planet, as shown in the illustration below.

Lagrangian mirrors

Two gigantic mirros at Langragian points L4 and L5 capture starlight and reflect it unto the planet. Illustration available on Flickr. Own work, published under the Creative Commons CC-BY-2.0 license.

Require that the bidders include in their proposals a complete and detailed discussion of the cost of designing, building, operating and maintaining the mirrors, together with an analysis of the savings resulting from the use of the proposed megastructures instead of mundane nuclear fusion reactors.

In the Instructions to Bidders document, make sure to stress that the solution must have a break-even time of no more than 5 millennia, assuming a modest 1.5% inflation rate and a reasonable 2% annual economic growth.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ooooh, this is cool, too! It would look like the planet was in a weird ternary star system. $\endgroup$ – JBH Jan 31 '18 at 3:47
  • $\begingroup$ Just have the mirrors rotate about their respective Lagrange points at a rate of once per year and you're in business. $\endgroup$ – Samuel Jan 31 '18 at 4:54
  • $\begingroup$ At night you could turn them to the stars as giant binoculars, yea! /s $\endgroup$ – ArtisticPhoenix Jan 31 '18 at 7:46
  • $\begingroup$ They wouldn't be visible on the night sky. $\endgroup$ – Real Subtle Jan 31 '18 at 10:31
2
$\begingroup$

Rather than complain about the science, let's have some fun with this.

Yes, the actual science says that a planet so distant from its sun woulnd't be earthlike at all. But, let's assume we care as much about fiction as we do about science and jump to the conclusion that your explorers could quickly make the planet very earthlike if they just had more sunlight to work with.

I'm thinking something along the lines of a Dyson Swarm, but skip all the habitation potential. What we really want are optics. So what we really want is...

  • Every element of the swarm can accept solar energy from the sun.

  • Every element of the swarm can shunt the energy in a direction tangental to the sphere described by the swarm. This is a fancy way of saying it can shunt the absorbed energy perpendicularly toward other elements. Thus, each element is not only absorbing, it's moving the energy along.

  • A ring mimicing the orbit of the planet surrounds the swarm such that at any point along the ring it can accept energy emitted from the swarm. Thus, energy emitted at the pole of the star is shunted around the sphere of the swarm until it's aligned long the ring, it then shunts the energy to the ring.

  • The ring, of course, shunts energy toward the planet, wherever that planet may be in its orbit.

Think of this as a mega-cool series of optics. Clarkian magic is necessary as it is required just to build the darned thing.

But the result is a concentrated beam of solar energy bookin' out toward the planet. It will disperse somewhat along the way, but when it arrives, it will provide the energy the planet needs. Not unlike using a magnifying glass to burn ants — except we don't want to burn the ants, we want to give them Mojitos.

Now that I think about it, what might be story-cool is to literally use optics such that every element of the swarm simply focuses absorbed solar energy to the nearest point along the ring. The ring then emits the light all along the elliptic of the planetary orbit such that the planet is moving through a plane of concentrated solar wind. To an observer outside the solar system, the star would appear to have a very bright ring fading into that elliptic. It would make a great piece of art.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, well played Sir. I have to remember not to take everything so literally. :) $\endgroup$ – Tim B II Jan 31 '18 at 1:48
0
$\begingroup$

You want to be very careful with this. If the planet is earth like, then suddenly increasing the amount of incident radiation by any appreciable amount is going to be Bad. If it’s more like a frozen earth then trying to terraform the whole planet will take a long time. In either case, I offer this solution:

Just ship a load of batteries.

Your hypothetical humans are thinking of relocating to another star. That indicates some serious space flight tech. You’ll also want to keep colony size manageable, either to avoid disastrous climate effects or because it’s reallly cold out. If you can move enough energy (in high density batteries, lumps of heated tungsten, however) from an inner orbit back out to your world you can precisely control the energy use and it’s fairly simple, as opposed to the high precision megastructures you’d need to change the incident sunlight.

Space stations in near orbit with solar panel farms or some other manner of energy packaging can offload batteries to energy shipping units, they fly out to the colony and swap the full batteries for empty ones, and everyone has power for heating/lighting/whatever. It may even (depending on shipping methods used, the state of your space flight/battery tech, how many stations and ships you have etc etc) represent a higher rate of energy input than redirecting a portion of the suns energy. It just arrives in discrete chunks rather than as a continuous rain of photons.

Never underestimate the energy bandwidth of a freighter full of batteries hurtling through interplanetary space at 70 Km/s.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.