I am developing a fictional world. There has been no animal life for 500 years. Assuming that humans were technologically advanced enough to keep the environment stable, what would they eat?

  • 11
    $\begingroup$ What do vegans eat? $\endgroup$ – AlexP Jan 28 '18 at 0:58
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Aren't humans animals? $\endgroup$ – sphennings Jan 28 '18 at 1:20
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ If there is no animal life at all (no insects, worms, etc.) you may run into a problem of sustaining higher plants. Can you specify the extent of lack of animals? $\endgroup$ – Olga Jan 28 '18 at 3:09
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ They would eat, cakes .. of course. $\endgroup$ – ArtisticPhoenix Jan 28 '18 at 5:01
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Humans are animal life.... plus if you take out insects and sea life you have huge problems with your ecosystem in terms of making it livable for humans. $\endgroup$ – Kilisi Jan 28 '18 at 8:27


I don't really see any reason to close this question, but the answer is pretty trivial. What do you eat that isn't animals? Here is a list of foods.

If you are more worried about the ecosystem effect of not having animals (such as pollinators), here is a list of bee-pollinated edible plants. There are some important foods on that list, but plenty of important plants that are not.

A full agricultural complex will have starchy staples, legumes, oil seeds, fiber plants, fruits (for vitamin C), and leafy greens. Examples in each category that are wind pollinated include:

  • Starchy staples: Wheat, rice, corn and bananas.

  • Legumes: Soybeans, lentil, pea, peanut

  • Oils: Soybeans, peanut, oil palm, olive

  • Fiber: Jute, hemp, raffia. Also, you can just replace cotton with nylon or polyester and skip the plants.

  • Fruits: Banana, dates, heirloom tomatoes, pineapple

  • Leafy greens: These will grow leaves without pollination; seeds can be produced from human pollinated hybrids.

So even without pollinators, you will be able to eat.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Peanuts would be a very large part of the diet. They have high protein which is the closest to meat protein on that list. Too bad sweet potatoes aren't included, they are almost identical to meat in terms of protein and would help keep people healthier. $\endgroup$ – Dan Clarke Jan 28 '18 at 6:54

There is a long history of vegetarian / vegan lifestyles (ranging back to the former 7th centruy BCE https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism and the latter 1944 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veganism). There are indicating that not eating meat or any animal based foods is survivable -- perhaps even more "healthy."

We eat protein to rebuild and repair our bodies and if necessary act as fuel, though the fuel aspect is better served by carbohydrates. One thing to keep in mind is that protein (one of the main things you get from food outside fibre, vitamins/minerals) is made up of amino acids. Amino acids are essentially complex molecules, found in cells, with short lifetimes. When you stop eating a diverse of foods your body must remanufacture the amino acids or operate in a deficient manner (this is a tree top level discussion, for instance animal fat can be considered "high powered" fuel -- forgive the lack of references, I've worked professionally with biology types).

All of this being said, you can produce animal proteins artificially in a lab. This would suggest that it could be done on an industrial level. I can't find any examples of anyone pursuing this strategy (again wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein).


Soylent Green

They could be vegans, but you know the truth...

Edit: Per Vincent's excellent comment below, not everyone has seen the movie Soylent Green (but you should fix that if you have not). The premise is that in a post-apocalyptic/Utopian future society people often opt to commit a form of assisted suicide where they are drugged into a state of euphoria before being put to sleep. Also, completely unrelated, everyone eats this super health food called Soylent Green.


Twist! in the words of Charlton Heston, "Soylent Green is people!!!!"

  • $\begingroup$ This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review $\endgroup$ – JohnWDailey Jan 28 '18 at 3:09
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnWDailey Why to you think that this does not provide an answer to the question? In a world where humans have displaced every other animal species, the soylent green solution of feeding dead humans back to the ignorant masses actually seems pretty reasonable. $\endgroup$ – MParm Jan 28 '18 at 3:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For those who haven't seen the movie, this is not an answer. $\endgroup$ – Vincent Jan 28 '18 at 4:35
  • $\begingroup$ @Vincent Wait, you're telling me there are people that Haven't Seen Soylent Green?!? o_O $\endgroup$ – MParm Jan 28 '18 at 4:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure of sustainable this is. How many humans a year does one human need to survive? Pretty sure this ends with a rapidly decreasing population until humans die out. $\endgroup$ – Lio Elbammalf Jan 28 '18 at 10:13

Without non-human animals, plants would need a source of carbon dioxide. When it comes to gases, plants are net oxygen producers. Fungi, on the other hand, are net carbon dioxide producers, just as animals are. The elimination of animal life might create more niches for fungal life.

It's possible that humans could selectively breed the fungi for nutritional value. Fungal steak, anyone?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.