Motivation
The question is inspired by the astronomy journal preprint released publicly today, entitled: From impact refugees to deterritorialized states: foresighting extreme legal-policy cases in asteroid impact scenarios?. The abstract of that article begins:
Throughout recorded history, humans have crossed national borders to seek safety in nearby countries. The reasons for displacement have been generated by phenomena of terrestrial origin, but exposure to unexpected extra-terrestrial threats poses a different scenario. An asteroid impact warning implies a change of paradigm which would represent a historic precedent.
The scenario it considers is one when an asteroid or other extraterrestrial object impact on Earth that we are not able to use planetary defense methods to prevent from hitting populated land on Earth that has hundreds of thousands or many millions of people.
But, in the scenario it considers, we can determine where it will hit, there will be at least enough time to allow many people to evacuate the impact zone, and it won't be so bad that it won't be survivable for other large regions of the planet.
Thus, an impact creating a need for a mass evacuation and a mass refugee event, but causing only a bump in the road in the long term fate of our species or global civilization as a whole.
Event Scale
Much Smaller Than
I am considering an impact much smaller than the one associated with the Chicxulub impact with an estimated diameter of 11–81 kilometers that caused the Cretaceous–Tertiary (K–T) extinction event ca. 66 million years ago ending the dinosaurs, and also smaller than the event assumed in the Younger Dryas Impact hypothesis which "posits that fragments of a large (more than 4 kilometers in diameter), disintegrating asteroid or comet struck North America, South America, Europe, and western Asia around 12,800 years ago" creating a massive resurgence of the conditions associated with the Last Glacial Maximum ca. 20,000 just as it was ending.
Similarly, I am looking for an impact that has a smaller geographic range and climate effect than than the Toba volcanic eruption ca. 75,000 years ago that caused a thousand years of global cooling and left debris from South India to Indonesia and across much of Southeast Asia which "made a sizable contribution to the 100 × 35 km caldera complex" with a dense-rock equivalent (DRE) estimate of 2,800 km3 (about 7×1015 kg) of erupted magma, of which 800 km3 was deposited as ash fall. In terms of scale:
The erupted mass was, at the very least, 12 times greater than that of the largest volcanic eruption in recent history, the 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia, which caused the 1816 "Year Without a Summer" in the Northern Hemisphere. Toba's erupted mass deposited an ash layer of about 15 centimetres (5.9 in) thick over the whole of South Asia. A blanket of volcanic ash was also deposited over the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea, and the South China Sea. Deep-sea cores retrieved from the South China Sea have extended the known reach of the eruption, suggesting that the 2,800 km3 calculation of the erupted mass is a minimum value or even an underestimate. Based on new methods (computational ash dispersal model using a 3D time-dependent tephra dispersion model, a set of wind fields, and several tens of thickness measurements of the YTT tephra deposit), the Toba Caldera Complex possibly erupted as much as 13,200 km3 in total bulk volume.
This question is similar to the existing Worldbuilding.SE question: What size object could wreak havoc on a world but not destroy it?. But, unlike that question, I am interested in an actual extraterrestrial impact, rather than a near miss, and with an event of a much less extreme scale.
Bigger Than
But, I am considering an event significantly bigger than the Tungsuka event of June 30, 1908, which is generally attributed to the atmospheric explosion of a stony meteoroid about 50–60 meters in size that is the largest impact event on Earth in recorded history, or with the hypothetical a cosmic airburst meteor in around 1650BCE hypothesized to be associated with the Hebrew Bible story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
I am looking for an impact that would be at least somewhat worse than the 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora, the most powerful volcanic eruption in recorded human history, in terms of its geographic scope and overall magnitude of damage caused.
About This Big
For example, I am thinking about an impact that would kill the vast majority of people who didn't relocate in the immediate impact and the first few days that followed, in a geographic area comparable in scale to Cyprus or Singapore, or Belgium, or Northern Ireland, or the more densely populated parts of Liberia.
(My scenario would exclude impacts in countries geographically large enough to respond entirely with internal migrations like Australia or the United States or Russia or Indonesia, which is why I don't use larger countries in my examples above, but that detail isn't actually relevant to the answer to this question.)
Maybe A Swarm Of Smaller Impactors
But, I don't intend to exclude the possibility of a swarm of many Tungsuka event sized meteors in a fairly compact geographic area, perhaps from an imperfect planetary defense effort along the lines of those being considered by NASA, that breaks up an otherwise worse impact (and possibly diverts some, but not all, of the mass that would otherwise impact Earth).
Bottom Line Question
In particular, I am asking:
What would be (1) the scale (i.e. how big an object in meters, and/or how big in meters, and how many objects, for a swarm of objects in close geographic proximity to each other) and (2) likelihood (i.e. once every how many years on average), of an event that could produce this much less extreme outcome (ideally with a range of values or confidence interval)?
Naively, I would expect such an event to involve an impactor of a hundred to fifteen hundred meters in size, and a likelihood of less frequently than every couple thousand years, but more frequently than every couple hundred thousand years, but I don't really have anything solid to back that up.
I also expect, but don't know, that impact object size has a distribution similar to that of earthquake absolute magnitude or absolute flood size with frequency and size related in a similar way.
My goal is to have a fairly specific scientific astronomy based launching point for the kind of scenario that the new scientific journal article is considering from a geopolitical and legal perspective, which I could develop myself in other directions.
Optional related bonus question
The next two questions might be better as follow up questions to this one, put I note them in case an answer to the primary questions makes an answer to these questions trivial or at least much easier to answer, for example, because they rely on the same sources.
What would be the likely duration and magnitude of the global climate impact of an extraterrestrial impact of this scale?