In my world there are two bodies of water. One acts as a radiation shield and is part of the atmosphere, so it needs some (undecided) force to keep it in place. The other is ideally twice as dense as what we consider regular water and I’m trying to figure out what effect the denser water would have on mobility while submerged.
-
$\begingroup$ I've edited your tags, as the science tag is about how a society views science, and your question is not about a society. Please feel free to revert if you see fit. Have you looked at the properties of the Dead Sea? $\endgroup$– Escaped dental patient.Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 20:57
-
$\begingroup$ Who is going to be submerged in this denser water? Normal humans? Humans with the denser water instead of normal water in their bodies? Aliens? $\endgroup$– Rob WattsCommented Apr 5, 2021 at 21:18
-
$\begingroup$ Heavy water is 10% more dense than regular water. $\endgroup$– Justin Thyme the SecondCommented Apr 5, 2021 at 23:07
-
1$\begingroup$ Density of the dead sea is about 25% more dese than regular water. $\endgroup$– Justin Thyme the SecondCommented Apr 5, 2021 at 23:11
-
$\begingroup$ Density of cement is 50% greater than regular water. $\endgroup$– Justin Thyme the SecondCommented Apr 5, 2021 at 23:11
2 Answers
Use the Dead Sea as a reference
I would suggest learning more about what it's like to swim in the Dead Sea. Thanks to its salt content, the water there is 25% more dense than fresh water. Even though that's not close to the 2x you wanted, you should be able to find plenty of research material. There is one thing I know:
while submerged
It's not going to be easy to be submerged. As you read about the Dead Sea, you'll see people talking about how it's almost impossible to swim in it due to how buoyant people are in it. In your 2x density liquid, that will be even more significant - with good balance you could probably make it look like you were walking through waist-deep fluid while floating.
In order to sink, you'll need to bring along weights that weigh a little bit more than you do (don't forget that the weights will have some buoyancy themselves). I think that the weights you need to stay submerged will actually affect your movement much more than the 2x dense liquid will.
More of a physics question than worldbuilding question really, but you would have twice the buoyancy with twice the pressure at the same depth as regular water, and twice the force/drag/lift. Water at double the density is 33% thicker than honey or molasses, but without the stickiness or viscosity if it still water. I couldn't actually find any liquid, common or uncommon, anywhere near twice as dense as water. There's a huge gap between something like honey and molasses which is ~1.5x as dense and bromine which is ~3x as dense, and then mercury which is much much more dense. And of all those the only one you would have experienced in daily life is honey or molasses.
All this means is you would have to also stroke twice as hard to swim in it, but you will also produce twice the force, but you also experience twice the drag. So your swim strokes would probably be slower. I think most people would interpret it as being easier to swim in.
-
$\begingroup$ There are some dense liquids that are almost good examples (like dibromoethane) but they're hella toxic and are somewhat more viscous than water. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 21:09
-
$\begingroup$ @StarfishPrime None that can be used as examples for a layman to imagine though. $\endgroup$– DKNguyenCommented Apr 5, 2021 at 21:09
-
$\begingroup$ Quicksand has a density twice that of water. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 23:22
-
$\begingroup$ Many years ago, my Fluids lecturer posed the question to the class "what would it be like to swim through honey?". The answer was, "you have to screw through". $\endgroup$– user81881Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 5:55
-
$\begingroup$ @Fred See, namely, a 1977 paper of Purcell, Life at low Reynold's number. A discussion of this can be found on a MathOverflow Q&A; there's probably one or more on Physics, but I haven't gone looking. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 11:08