Timeline for Is this a plausible reason for kingdoms to resolve conflicts via representative duels?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2017 at 9:48 | comment | added | Amadeus | The OP says ..thus giving monarchs an incentive to find and sponsor the most skilled fencers..., so clearly he has chosen the weapon; and the venue must clearly be secure for both Kings, lest assassination ensue. Also, in the single-combat story of David v. Goliath; Neither weapons or venue were chosen; soldiers from each side were sent Armed however they pleased. David with a sling, Goliath presumably with armor and sword. I agree you have a fun idea, but it is not an answer to this question. | |
| Jul 19, 2017 at 7:53 | comment | added | Martin Bonner supports Monica | That is how duels worked in the 18th and 19th century in Europe. There are other ways of organizing duels. | |
| Jul 18, 2017 at 16:15 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jul 18, 2017 at 22:25 | |||||
| Jul 18, 2017 at 15:48 | history | answered | Willk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |