Skip to main content
31 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Sep 12, 2017 at 18:08 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Sep 12, 2017 at 18:08 history notice removed CommunityBot
Sep 8, 2017 at 23:44 comment added rus9384 @Necessity, in reality no genes are absolutely dominant/recessive, in any particular cell each gene will be active with some probabilty.
Sep 8, 2017 at 23:26 answer added FFN timeline score: 0
Sep 8, 2017 at 22:52 comment added user32862 @FFN genitor would be the biological "father" in this case, viewed more like a sperm donor in this culture. He may be a close family friend or the women's current lover, but he would have no actual rights to the child in the way he would in our society. Pater would be the actual "father" in the sense that he would help raise and take care of the child, usually a cousin or brother of the mother.
Sep 8, 2017 at 22:31 comment added FFN I'm very interested in the difference between pater and genitor. If you could elaborate on that, maybe I can think of an interesting answer. Also, consider that many things in human development are sociological, not biological. This means that a child may develop traits similar to the ones his pater displays, even if the pater played no part in creating the child.
Sep 6, 2017 at 20:18 answer added anon timeline score: 0
Sep 5, 2017 at 17:58 answer added Lee Leon timeline score: 0
Sep 5, 2017 at 16:24 answer added akaioi timeline score: 0
Sep 5, 2017 at 1:14 answer added Diserasta timeline score: 0
Sep 4, 2017 at 23:33 answer added Braydon timeline score: 0
Sep 4, 2017 at 17:53 comment added Necessity Just don't have dominant or recessive genes and make the genes selected randomly(or selected by the soul or however you want to explain it). This also meas more than two strands of dna can be in a person.
Sep 4, 2017 at 17:38 history edited user32862 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 85 characters in body
Sep 4, 2017 at 17:11 answer added ZioByte timeline score: 0
S Sep 4, 2017 at 16:30 history bounty started CommunityBot
S Sep 4, 2017 at 16:30 history notice added user32862 Current answers are outdated
Aug 28, 2017 at 21:54 history edited user32862 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Aug 23, 2017 at 15:46 history edited user32862 CC BY-SA 3.0
Changed question to narrow down responses.
Aug 22, 2017 at 17:49 history edited user32862 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 25 characters in body
Aug 22, 2017 at 12:55 history edited user32862 CC BY-SA 3.0
added more detail to the question.
Jul 1, 2017 at 14:30 history edited user32862 CC BY-SA 3.0
Added more detail to the question
Jun 30, 2017 at 0:24 comment added Malady I'd like a more explanatory title... And I've got an answer... Whoops, you're talking about the culture I was gonna use. ... Unless you literally mean 'spirits' as in mysti-magical stuff, I've got no answer ... Why not just use that culture you're citing as your inspiration?
Jun 30, 2017 at 0:06 answer added Willk timeline score: 2
Jun 29, 2017 at 23:31 answer added Jan timeline score: 3
Jun 29, 2017 at 23:14 answer added Logan R. Kearsley timeline score: 4
Jun 29, 2017 at 23:14 answer added LSerni timeline score: 8
Jun 29, 2017 at 23:03 history edited user32862 CC BY-SA 3.0
Added more context
Jun 29, 2017 at 23:01 comment added user32862 I meant a piece of their spirit that gradially grows.
Jun 29, 2017 at 22:53 comment added Arvex If the biological father were to pass on their spirit, then would they not die in the process? That sounds like population growth would be impossible. Without a high rate of twins being born, the population would at best break even with mortality rates. Or do you mean a piece of their spirit?
Jun 29, 2017 at 22:52 comment added AlexP "The spirit [...] possessed the consciousness of a person; morals, values, strengths, etc." What does this have to do with biology? This is education. A child receives their morals, values, strengths, and so on, from their educators. See the ancient concept of paideia.
Jun 29, 2017 at 22:44 history asked user32862 CC BY-SA 3.0