Timeline for How big a population can the solar system support considering only power and living space?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2018 at 12:18 | vote | accept | LOIS 16192 | ||
| Jun 2, 2017 at 13:32 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 45 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2017 at 18:27 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2017 at 18:17 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 462 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2017 at 17:37 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2017 at 17:36 | comment | added | MolbOrg | "The title asks for ..." - yes, it is the ops Q problem, not the answer problem, just noticed that as one was in search of variable :) | |
| May 30, 2017 at 17:36 | comment | added | sphennings | @JoeBloggs I still appreciate the suggestion for improvement. If it wasn't specified in the question it should certainly be added. | |
| May 30, 2017 at 17:35 | comment | added | sphennings | @MolbOrg The title asks for consideration of only power and living space. | |
| May 30, 2017 at 17:34 | comment | added | Joe Bloggs | @MolbOrg : aaaaaand selective blindness strikes again. Now my idiocy will be preserved for posterity by the power of the InterTubes. | |
| May 30, 2017 at 17:31 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2017 at 17:30 | comment | added | MolbOrg | @JoeBloggs watts per person are given by OP constraints aka 1MW. biggest variable there will be which matter is those 1000 tons per person. | |
| May 30, 2017 at 17:29 | history | edited | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2017 at 17:27 | comment | added | Joe Bloggs | +1 for simplicity in reasoning. Can you put in the watts per person figures you're using? Seems like that could be the biggest point of variance here. With selective breeding for slow metabolisms you could probably change this number a fair bit! | |
| May 30, 2017 at 17:12 | history | answered | sphennings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |