English is not my main languaje BUT:

There are several things wrong with this question, first of all, it asumes than just because you add biology the AI would be capable of make a sustanable world, the thing is, if you make an AI with biological components, you are not making an AI at all, you are making a living being and changing the "programming" of his brain to match the AI programming, but is not an AI, its a twisted aberration of a once live sentient creature, which was stripped from him's memorys and basic human(?) psyche which was replaced by an AI-mindlike program and remained alive after that.

Because of this, him behaviour will change because you change the memorys and stuff on him's mind to the AI version. i'm also asuming than the AI code was adapted to work with this new "Hardware" (i.e. the brain of the poor soul subject of this aberrant experiment). So in short, because he is a living being, he would be self-councious of itself (at the bare minimun, he feel the pain when he hit himself with something), he would be subject of experience (just like any other multi-celular living form) BUT he will be believing he is and he would behave like the AI is programmed to do/or how the AI reconfig him to do it.

Alternatibly you can have a responsive AI interphase in a character who checks for emotions of the subject and act acordingly, but in that case it will probably will be a support AI, not a fully responsive AI, hence, is a second "subject" itself, like a benign parasitic AI.

There is no such case like a "Biological IA" BUT there are advance living organism, theorically, if you make a Bio-Computer, you are making a very powerfull brain with life support and some mechanical-reflective interphase to process input and force itself to process it, which can also show it's output to a screen and perceive the world/receive stimuli from keyboard and mouse, it would be able to "feel" probably, and probably will wish and behave in some manner too, all animals do that, theorys in Animal Psycology and Animal Culture exist nowadays (you can check for them in google if you want), but have in mind than, as a living being, he will have his own volitions, granted, he develop his own species-specific culture, and probably doesn't understand or perceive the world like humans would do, but the thing is it won't be necesarely benevolent, just like dogs, or humans, or any other animal species can do harm to others.

There would be another posibility for bio-computers too, which happends could be cleaner, with less possible suffering involved and not affected by the things propers of living beings like volition, will or wishes, but for the purpose of this question, they escape the scope because they do not resemble any kind of inteligence beyond we already develop in programming.

This was wroted by a guy who study a humanistic carreer first, and then become programmer if that's important in some way, i think not, but could it be for you reader :S.

Have a great day!

English is not my main language BUT:

There are several things wrong with this question, first of all, it assumes that just because you add biology the AI would be capable of making a sustainable world. The thing is, if you make an AI with biological components, you are not making an AI at all, you are making a living being and changing the "programming" of his brain to match the AI programming. But this is not an AI, it's a twisted aberration of a once living sentient creature, which was stripped from his memories and basic human  (?) psyche, which was replaced by an AI-mindlike program and remained alive after that.

Because of this, his behaviour will change, because you changed the memories and stuff on his mind to the AI version. I'm also assuming that the AI code was adapted to work with this new "Hardware" (i.e. the brain of the poor soul subject of this aberrant experiment). So in short, because he is a living being, he would be self-councious of himself (at the bare minimun, he will feel the pain when he is hitting himself with something), he would be subject of experience (just like any other multi-cellular lifeform), BUT he will be believing he is and he would behave like the AI is programmed to do/or how the AI reconfigured him to do it.

Alternatively you can have a responsive AI interphase in a character who checks for emotions of the subject and act accordingly, but in that case it will probably be a support AI, not a fully responsive AI, hence, is a second "subject" itself, like a benign parasitic AI.

There is no such thing like a "Biological IA" BUT there are advanced living organisms. Theorically if you make a Bio-Computer, you are making a very powerful brain with life support and some mechanical-reflective interphase to process input and force itself to process it, which can also show its output to a screen and perceive the world/receive stimuli from keyboard and mouse. It would be able to "feel" probably, and probably will wish and behave in some manner too. All animals do that. Theories in Animal Psychology and Animal Culture exist nowadays (you can check for them in google if you want), but keep in mind that as a living being he will have his own volitions. He would develop his own species-specific culture and probably doesn't understand or perceive the world like humans would do, but the thing is it won't be necessarely benevolent, just like dogs, or humans, or any other animal species can do harm to others.

There would be another posibility for bio-computers too, which could be cleaner, with less possible suffering involved and not affected by the things proper of living beings like volition, will or wishes, but for the purpose of this question, they escape the scope because they do not resemble any kind of intelligence beyond what we already develop in programming.

This was written by a guy who studied a humanistic career first and then became a programmer if that's important in some way. I think not, but it could be for you reader :S.

Have a great day!

English is not my main languaje BUT:

There are several things wrong with this question, first of all, it asumes than just because you add biology the AI would be capable of make a sustanable world, the thing is, if you make an AI with biological components, you are not making an AI at all, you are making a living being and changing the "programming" of his brain to match the AI programming, but is not an AI, its a twisted aberration of a once live sentient creature, which was stripped from him's memorys and basic human(?) psyche which was replaced by an AI-mindlike prgoram and remained alive after that.

Because of this, him behaviour will change because you change the memorys and stuff on him's mind to the AI version. i'm also asuming than the AI code was adapted to work with this new "Hardware" (i.e. the brain of the poor soul subject of this aberrant experiment). So in short, because he is a living being, he would be self-councious of itself (at the bare minimun, he feel the pain when he hit himself with something), he would be subject of experience (just like any other multi-celular living form) BUT he will be believing he is and he would behave like the AI is programmed to do/or how the AI reconfig him to do it.

Alternatibly you can have a responsive AI interphase in a character who checks for emotions of the subject and act acordingly, but in that case it will probably will be a support AI, not a fully responsive AI, hence, is a second "subject" itself, like a benign parasitic AI.

There is no such case like a "Biological IA" BUT there are advance living organism, theorically, if you make a Bio-Computer, you are making a very powerfull brain with life support and some mechanical-reflective interphase to process input and force itself to process it, which can also show it's output to a screen and perceive the world/receive stimuli from keyboard and mouse, it would be able to "feel" probably, and probably will wish and behave in some manner too, all animals do that, theorys in Animal Psycology and Animal Culture exist nowadays (you can check for them in google if you want), but have in mind than, as a living being, he will have his own volitions, granted, he develop his own species-specific culture, and probably doesn't understand or perceive the world like humans would do, but the thing is it won't be necesarely benevolent, just like dogs, or humans, or any other animal species can do harm to others.

There would be another posibility for bio-machines too, but for the purpose of this question, they escape the scope.

Have a great day!

English is not my main languaje BUT:

There are several things wrong with this question, first of all, it asumes than just because you add biology the AI would be capable of make a sustanable world, the thing is, if you make an AI with biological components, you are not making an AI at all, you are making a living being and changing the "programming" of his brain to match the AI programming, but is not an AI, its a twisted aberration of a once live sentient creature, which was stripped from him's memorys and basic human(?) psyche which was replaced by an AI-mindlike program and remained alive after that.

Because of this, him behaviour will change because you change the memorys and stuff on him's mind to the AI version. i'm also asuming than the AI code was adapted to work with this new "Hardware" (i.e. the brain of the poor soul subject of this aberrant experiment). So in short, because he is a living being, he would be self-councious of itself (at the bare minimun, he feel the pain when he hit himself with something), he would be subject of experience (just like any other multi-celular living form) BUT he will be believing he is and he would behave like the AI is programmed to do/or how the AI reconfig him to do it.

Alternatibly you can have a responsive AI interphase in a character who checks for emotions of the subject and act acordingly, but in that case it will probably will be a support AI, not a fully responsive AI, hence, is a second "subject" itself, like a benign parasitic AI.

There is no such case like a "Biological IA" BUT there are advance living organism, theorically, if you make a Bio-Computer, you are making a very powerfull brain with life support and some mechanical-reflective interphase to process input and force itself to process it, which can also show it's output to a screen and perceive the world/receive stimuli from keyboard and mouse, it would be able to "feel" probably, and probably will wish and behave in some manner too, all animals do that, theorys in Animal Psycology and Animal Culture exist nowadays (you can check for them in google if you want), but have in mind than, as a living being, he will have his own volitions, granted, he develop his own species-specific culture, and probably doesn't understand or perceive the world like humans would do, but the thing is it won't be necesarely benevolent, just like dogs, or humans, or any other animal species can do harm to others.

There would be another posibility for bio-computers too, which happends could be cleaner, with less possible suffering involved and not affected by the things propers of living beings like volition, will or wishes, but for the purpose of this question, they escape the scope because they do not resemble any kind of inteligence beyond we already develop in programming.

This was wroted by a guy who study a humanistic carreer first, and then become programmer if that's important in some way, i think not, but could it be for you reader :S.

Have a great day!