Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 26, 2017 at 21:49 comment added Joshua @RuiFRibeiro: Solution: bring modern reprints of Vulgate. Sure they look boring, but if you asked half the price of a hand-copied one ...
Mar 25, 2017 at 21:36 comment added Rui F Ribeiro Their tongue wont be the same as of today, it is not exactly Holywood where everyone speaks modern English in the past and future.
Mar 25, 2017 at 20:19 comment added EvilSnack The times and places where a non-Latin translation was illegal varied over time.
Mar 24, 2017 at 3:35 comment added can-ned_food Indeed. I don't think the question was “How do I precede Martin Luther by a few centuries?” ;-)
Mar 24, 2017 at 0:57 comment added Mark A Bible wouldn't be very good: a modern printing of the Vulgate would look boring (if somewhat exotic) in comparison to the lavishly illustrated works of art in common use at the time; any other edition of the Bible would risk getting you branded a heretic.
Mar 23, 2017 at 16:13 comment added Stephan Kolassa @TheBlackCat: the claim that it was a crime is a bit too strong. The idea itself might land the OP in hot water, though.
Mar 23, 2017 at 15:46 comment added TheBlackCat At the time having a Bible in anything other than Latin, or in fact anything other than the specific Vulgate Latin version, was a crime.
Mar 23, 2017 at 15:44 history edited bhilgert CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Mar 23, 2017 at 15:35 history answered bhilgert CC BY-SA 3.0