Timeline for Why would a decision making machine decide to destroy itself?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2016 at 12:09 | comment | added | Mithrandir24601 | I should have checked the edit history - my bad, sorry! Having said that, you might want to edit your answer to mention that the question was edited after you wrote your answer | |
| Dec 20, 2016 at 3:31 | comment | added | X13 | Since the machine can't practically simulate the action of the user (anything can be done in different ways) it actually simulates it's own 'actions' (i.e. printing output) - @Mithrandir24601 | |
| Dec 20, 2016 at 3:28 | comment | added | X13 | Point #5 originally stated: | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 17:35 | comment | added | Mithrandir24601 | I'm confused - you seem to have based this entire argument around the point that it "can't simulate the action of the user and it can only simulate its own actions", whereas note 5 actually states "reaction of the user is part of what's being simulated", so can you explain how your argument follows? | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 16:48 | history | edited | X13 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added: This will get you an output that has "destroy the machine" in it and not one that is wholey "destroy the machine"
|
| Dec 19, 2016 at 16:46 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 19, 2016 at 17:35 | |||||
| Dec 19, 2016 at 16:43 | history | answered | X13 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |