Timeline for What side effects would a genetically enhanced 10 times stronger human have?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2020 at 23:17 | comment | added | user79911 | Clumsyness. Normal objects would not survive being manipulated. A coffee cup would be fragile as an eggshell. And egg would be as sturdy as candyfloss. Paper would shred from the least contact. And this is unavoidable, because they are both stronger and have vastly tougher skin, needed to survive application of the strength. | |
| Nov 26, 2019 at 23:09 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 26, 2019 at 20:31 | answer | added | Demigan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 26, 2019 at 18:22 | answer | added | Nosajimiki | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 8, 2019 at 0:55 | answer | added | user39504 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 8, 2019 at 0:18 | answer | added | Chenxi GE | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 7, 2019 at 22:10 | answer | added | Ardijan Kuqi | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 29, 2017 at 9:11 | history | edited | Secespitus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Replaced HTML with markdown
|
| Oct 10, 2016 at 21:04 | answer | added | Pliny | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 10, 2016 at 12:03 | vote | accept | Majaii | ||
| Oct 8, 2016 at 2:18 | comment | added | Majaii | @mike dibaggio and Lord Dust, interesting point. I am not opposed to a different way of increasing strength. I was actually considering different materials added to the bone, but I hadn't thought of something different for the muscles, I like the idea of applying new materials there as well for increased elasticity. I mainly thought of density as part of it as I need more durability along with strength and stamina. | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 22:35 | answer | added | Lord Dust | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 21:54 | comment | added | Lord Dust | I am also interested to know if increased muscle mass and density is the intended solution. Given the diminishing returns of standard strength training, I feel like demanding ten times potential strength is already pushing the boundaries of possibility. | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 21:21 | comment | added | intrepidhero | I always assumed that was because they were swinging through the trees looking for snacks all day instead of reading stackexchange. ;-) | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 19:41 | comment | added | Durakken | There are other apes that has less mass, etc than us, that has 10x strength. The difference seems to come from simple muscular connections, but I don't remember quite what is the case or which ape it is. | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 19:40 | history | edited | Bookeater | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 7, 2016 at 19:39 | comment | added | Mike DiBaggio | You say only that they are 10x stronger, but seem to imply that this is done by an increase in the density of the body tissues. That is not the only way to achieve what you're looking for, though. For instance, muscle tissue could be made out of a different, more elastic substance, or bones made out of a tougher but lighter substance, etc... Are you dead set on it being accomplished by an increase in muscle/bone density? | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 19:39 | history | edited | Bookeater | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo corrected
|
| Oct 7, 2016 at 19:11 | answer | added | Salmoncrusher | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 18:52 | answer | added | Twelfth | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 7, 2016 at 18:42 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 7, 2016 at 20:35 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2016 at 18:37 | history | asked | Majaii | CC BY-SA 3.0 |