Skip to main content
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Nathaniel Ford
  • 3.7k
  • 20
  • 27

In modern democracies, voter fraud is no problem. Actual temperingtampering with the voting process is done by more complex mechanisms that can be done openly. It is all about discouraging people to vote who would vote in a majority against your interest or allowing people to vote who will vote for you. Refer for example to Last Week Tonight on the system in the US for inspiration.

You can:

  • prohibit, that certain groups of people vote at all: elders, certain types of criminals, poor, you can have age restrictions, restrictions based on income, gender, you name it!
  • influence which types of immigrants can vote - This goes both ways, e. g. certain cities in Europe allow EU-citizens to vote for majors if they live in the city, even if they are not citizens of this country
  • have strict ID-Laws that require IDs certain groups might or might not have, e.g. drivers license or fishing license.
  • make it difficult/easy to vote depending on location. If the people living in rural areas don't vote in your interest, then make it harder for small villages to set up a place to vote.

The best part about thosethese kinds of temperingtampering is, that there is no risk of a scandal, whenwhere everything might get revealed to the public. You can always act as if your actions are a way of protecting the democracy! Isn't that lovely?

In modern democracies, voter fraud is no problem. Actual tempering with the voting process is done by more complex mechanisms that can be done openly. It is all about discouraging people to vote who would vote in a majority against your interest or allowing people to vote who will vote for you. Refer for example to Last Week Tonight on the system in the US for inspiration.

You can

  • prohibit, that certain groups of people vote at all: elders, certain types of criminals, poor, you can have age restrictions, restrictions based on income, gender, you name it!
  • influence which types of immigrants can vote - This goes both ways, e. g. certain cities in Europe allow EU-citizens to vote for majors if they live in the city, even if they are not citizens of this country
  • have strict ID-Laws that require IDs certain groups might or might not have, e.g. drivers license or fishing license.
  • make it difficult/easy to vote depending on location. If the people living in rural areas don't vote in your interest, then make it harder for small villages to set up a place to vote.

The best part about those kinds of tempering is, that there is no risk of a scandal, when everything might get revealed to the public. You can always act as if your actions are a way of protecting the democracy! Isn't that lovely?

In modern democracies, voter fraud is no problem. Actual tampering with the voting process is done by more complex mechanisms that can be done openly. It is all about discouraging people to vote who would vote in a majority against your interest or allowing people to vote who will vote for you. Refer for example to Last Week Tonight on the system in the US for inspiration.

You can:

  • prohibit, that certain groups of people vote at all: elders, certain types of criminals, poor, you can have age restrictions, restrictions based on income, gender, you name it!
  • influence which types of immigrants can vote - This goes both ways, e. g. certain cities in Europe allow EU-citizens to vote for majors if they live in the city, even if they are not citizens of this country
  • have strict ID-Laws that require IDs certain groups might or might not have, e.g. drivers license or fishing license.
  • make it difficult/easy to vote depending on location. If the people living in rural areas don't vote in your interest, then make it harder for small villages to set up a place to vote.

The best part about these kinds of tampering is, that there is no risk of a scandal, where everything might get revealed to the public. You can always act as if your actions are a way of protecting the democracy! Isn't that lovely?

Source Link
don-joe
  • 1k
  • 7
  • 7

In modern democracies, voter fraud is no problem. Actual tempering with the voting process is done by more complex mechanisms that can be done openly. It is all about discouraging people to vote who would vote in a majority against your interest or allowing people to vote who will vote for you. Refer for example to Last Week Tonight on the system in the US for inspiration.

You can

  • prohibit, that certain groups of people vote at all: elders, certain types of criminals, poor, you can have age restrictions, restrictions based on income, gender, you name it!
  • influence which types of immigrants can vote - This goes both ways, e. g. certain cities in Europe allow EU-citizens to vote for majors if they live in the city, even if they are not citizens of this country
  • have strict ID-Laws that require IDs certain groups might or might not have, e.g. drivers license or fishing license.
  • make it difficult/easy to vote depending on location. If the people living in rural areas don't vote in your interest, then make it harder for small villages to set up a place to vote.

The best part about those kinds of tempering is, that there is no risk of a scandal, when everything might get revealed to the public. You can always act as if your actions are a way of protecting the democracy! Isn't that lovely?