Timeline for Would animals from Earth be able to survive and reproduce on this planet?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2016 at 10:27 | answer | added | Mike Scott | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 10:19 | answer | added | Luís Henrique | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 8:31 | comment | added | Mołot | Please read this meta question - it shows how frustrating are changes for people who answer. | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 7:43 | history | rollback | user |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Sep 21, 2016 at 7:43 | comment | added | user | @JohnDallman The luminosity is now 54% $L_\odot{}$. I'm rolling this back to the original revision because there is no way we can answer a moving target. Stephanie, I recommend that you post a new question that fixes the issues identified with this question, showing that you have learned something from this one, instead of repeatedly making answer-invalidating edits. | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 17:13 | history | edited | Stephanie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Sep 20, 2016 at 17:06 | history | edited | Stephanie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 20, 2016 at 16:57 | comment | added | John Dallman | The planet is also going to be very, very cold if the star really has 0.54% of Sol's luminosity. Or did you mean 54%? You do have to get these numbers right if you want sensible answers. | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 14:50 | comment | added | user | Stephanie, while I can appreciate that you probably made an honest mistake in this case, it really isn't considered good form to make such a drastic change as you did (0.20% of Earth atmospheric pressure to 20%) after answers have been posted. At that point, if you realize you've made a mistake like that, it would be better to post an entirely new question because the answer is going to be completely different. I won't roll back the edit unilaterally right away (I could), but I really encourage you to roll back your edit, and then post a new question with the corrected premise. | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 14:32 | comment | added | user | @Burki Well, 0.049 Earth masses and 0.20% surface atmospheric pressure does sound about right to a first order approximation. | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 14:32 | history | edited | Stephanie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 20, 2016 at 14:29 | comment | added | Burki | Is that a typo for your atmospheric pressure? If not, i don't think any thing (apart from maybe bacteria) could breathe there | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 14:29 | answer | added | user | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 14:25 | comment | added | user23110 | I doubt that planet would have an atmosphere that is possible to breathe... mars is 0.107 M⊕, and we can't even use parachutes.... Maybe water bears? | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 14:19 | history | asked | Stephanie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |