Timeline for How would exposing a female warrior's (mostly) bare bottom help her in combat?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2018 at 15:56 | comment | added | Robert Columbia | This apples to men also, and was one of the notable advantages that the Black Watch regiment had in battle. | |
| Jan 15, 2018 at 16:12 | comment | added | Amoeba | @OneNormalNight how about all women in this universe are born without sphincters | |
| Sep 9, 2016 at 23:20 | comment | added | Peter Cordes | @One: Sexist society makes it socially acceptable for women to wear revealing clothing, or even expected/required. In our society, it's more accepted for women to wear thongs at the beach than for men, and basically show off their boobs in more situations than it's accepted for men to show off their chest muscles. Imagine a guy wearing a rock-star wide open shirt on a formal-dress occasional where women are wearing low-cut but formal dresses and guys in tuxes. Plus, specific to this case: men's external genitalia would be more likely to show in ass-less armour. plus: hairy asses aren't popular | |
| Sep 9, 2016 at 18:50 | comment | added | One Normal Night | This is genius, but why would it only apply to females? | |
| Sep 9, 2016 at 2:22 | history | answered | Mirror318 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |