Timeline for Surviving an Overwhelming Siege
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Aug 3, 2016 at 22:26 | comment | added | Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine | Not all losses are equal. Losing soldiers in the field will sway public opinion against the war. Losing civilians at home to terror attacks can easily spun by the big government as “look at those brutal animals of Lusom! We must squash them, to be safe again” — quite drowning out your statements that the attacks are only intended as a reaction against the war. | |
Aug 3, 2016 at 8:46 | comment | added | Revolver_Ocelot | @CeilingGecko you are not pinning the blame. You are admitting that they are your loyal followers which do not like this war. You are basically saying that people will die until EE stops this war. Your only problem is potential media suppression shifting blame to some unrelated cause. As enemy is very concious about their losses as OP post states, it will sways public opinion against the war. Like second Vietnam. | |
Aug 3, 2016 at 8:42 | comment | added | Ceiling Gecko | At 1000 attacks per day, if one of your citizens gets captured or breaks under torture, then your plan on pinning the blame will start to crumble. | |
Aug 3, 2016 at 8:37 | review | First posts | |||
Aug 3, 2016 at 8:41 | |||||
Aug 3, 2016 at 8:35 | history | answered | Revolver_Ocelot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |