Timeline for Personal Shield Generators effects on Strategy/Logistics/Tactics
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 3, 2018 at 13:46 | history | edited | Joe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
.
|
S May 3, 2018 at 13:44 | history | rollback | Joe |
Rollback to Revision 4 - Edit approval overridden by post owner or moderator
|
|
May 2, 2018 at 19:33 | history | suggested | Jason_c_o | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed an in-answer response to a (supposedly) deleted comment.
|
May 2, 2018 at 18:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 3, 2018 at 13:44 | |||||
May 2, 2018 at 15:43 | history | edited | Joe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected name
|
May 2, 2018 at 15:18 | history | edited | Joe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Correcting overzealous expression of boredom, restoring to Original content.
|
May 2, 2018 at 8:55 | history | edited | EveryBitHelps | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Broke up the wall of text.
|
Jul 28, 2016 at 21:39 | comment | added | Seeds | I too think most would skip it, especially since the thing, as described, is basically disposable. If they were produced most will never see action, they would be switched on and depleted, at significant cost, for nothing. So some important people might get them, at the cost of several hundred rifles, rifles that can be used over and over. No, expensive disposable objects are way more expensive than they seem, the cost of a core would have to be closer to the cost of a bullet, or be rechargeable, to see any wide use. | |
Jul 28, 2016 at 18:21 | history | answered | Joe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |