Timeline for Ways to decrease social mobility other than aristocracy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2017 at 16:39 | comment | added | Perkins | Actually you want everyone to attend the government indoctrination centers... er... I mean schools... You just want only the rich to actually be able to get a real education and learn finance and critical thinking skills. | |
| Jul 13, 2017 at 8:07 | comment | added | Rekesoft | What's the problem with leaving the hand of the market doing it? Unfettered capitalism will provide the lack of social mobility you look for without doing nothing special. Just keep social programs and wealth distribution low or non-existent and unequality will emerge by itself. | |
| Jul 13, 2017 at 7:43 | answer | added | Separatrix | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 13, 2017 at 0:24 | comment | added | JDługosz | What iAdjunct said! See This thread for some more specific advice. You stated the question up front OK, but then give only details necessary to what was said, not your entire book. | |
| Jul 12, 2017 at 23:40 | answer | added | Perkins | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 15, 2016 at 4:20 | comment | added | Xandar The Zenon | What exactly do you define conservatism as? Do you mean conservative, as in conserving your resources? Because that is the only definition that could be at least partially accurate based on your description. | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 20:52 | comment | added | John Dallman | Why do they bother with this pretence of democracy? Getting the population to back the conservative regime should be quite easy with full control of the media. Instituting a restrictive system of social classes will then get people to perpetuate the system for you. It doesn't have to be a "legal aristocracy" if breaking with the social system is sufficiently outrageous. | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 15:21 | comment | added | Joe | all bears are equal, but some are more equal than others... :) just kidding, a well - explained question...wordy, but thorough. | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 14:58 | answer | added | AGentleRose | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 14:08 | answer | added | wizardzz | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 13:28 | answer | added | nzaman | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 13:12 | comment | added | kingledion | tl;dr. You can split up the bullets into individual questions and ask them over the course of a few days. | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 12:41 | comment | added | iAdjunct | There is a lot of unnecessary detail in here which is distracting to your question for anybody not willing to spend half an hour on reading a single question; I strongly suggest reducing this. | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 12:08 | history | asked | MedwedianPresident | CC BY-SA 3.0 |