Skip to main content
52 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16 at 9:42 review Suggested edits
Jun 16 at 10:10
Aug 17, 2023 at 20:04 review Suggested edits
Aug 18, 2023 at 2:15
Apr 11, 2019 at 17:52 review Suggested edits
Apr 11, 2019 at 19:03
S Nov 22, 2017 at 4:19 history edited a4android CC BY-SA 3.0
i corrected the grammar at the part where it said "but they only killed 1%"; 'they' instead of 'theses guys' which also corrects the spelling too
S Nov 22, 2017 at 4:19 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 3.0
i corrected the grammar at the part where it said "but they only killed 1%"
Nov 22, 2017 at 4:08 review Suggested edits
S Nov 22, 2017 at 4:19
Feb 8, 2016 at 23:58 comment added Joshua @Towell: Because God said he wouldn't do that again.
Jun 12, 2015 at 23:47 comment added Towell Why not a flood? It killed everyone but a family before
Dec 21, 2014 at 21:19 comment added Rand al'Thor Worldbuilding, also known as the Evil Geniuses' Stack Exchange...
Nov 25, 2014 at 5:42 comment added Cort Ammon One way you might be able to work around the hold is to provide suggestions on how to weed out bad solutions from good ones. Are there timeframes you want to keep? Technology levels you are limiting yourself to? Particular religions whose verses must be used in the solution?
Nov 25, 2014 at 5:35 comment added Robert Boettcher Nuclear Explosions over densely populated areas would cause firestorms, which would create huge amounts of dust and soot. The dust and soot would travel into the atmosphere, preventing the sunlight from reaching the surface of the planet and increasing its albedo. Global averages temperatures would fall on an average of 4 to 8 degress celsius. Agriculture would all but collapse. Once the food supplies run out after three weeks, all humans would face starvation. Without a way to remove the dust, within a few years everyone should be dead from starvation.
Nov 25, 2014 at 5:08 comment added TecBrat If you're okay with pseudo science that PROBABLY doesn't work in the real world, you could use Tesla Scalar Weapons either to directly destroy all mankind, or to set off catastrophes like the eruption of Yellowstone and giant Hurricanes and Typhoons.
Nov 25, 2014 at 4:57 comment added Shokhet @HDE226868 Now five votes. ;-)
Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 answer added Black timeline score: 2
Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 history closed Mourdos
bowlturner
HDE 226868
Brythan
Shokhet
Not suitable for this site
Nov 25, 2014 at 4:32 answer added catalyst timeline score: 3
Nov 25, 2014 at 4:14 answer added Adam D. Ruppe timeline score: 2
Nov 25, 2014 at 3:04 answer added user3225 timeline score: 1
Nov 25, 2014 at 3:01 answer added yters timeline score: 3
Nov 25, 2014 at 2:12 comment added HDE 226868 By the way, a note to the general public: There are currently 4 close votes on the question because it's primarily an idea generation question, and hence off-topic for the site.
Nov 25, 2014 at 2:10 comment added HDE 226868 @DavidWallace We're harmless. Mostly harmless.
Nov 25, 2014 at 2:08 comment added Dawood ibn Kareem It disturbs me a little how many people seem to have given this matter an awful lot of thought.
Nov 25, 2014 at 1:47 comment added Cort Ammon Convince him to let you just build an Ark instead.
Nov 25, 2014 at 1:00 history edited Vincent CC BY-SA 3.0
Some minor fixes
Nov 25, 2014 at 0:57 answer added Victor Stafusa timeline score: 10
Nov 25, 2014 at 0:53 review Close votes
Nov 25, 2014 at 4:47
Nov 25, 2014 at 0:49 comment added ApproachingDarknessFish What sort of capabilities do you have at your disposal? Are how asking how an ordinary human could go about accomplishing this, or can ask God for a few black holes?
Nov 25, 2014 at 0:28 comment added Beta Ask "God" for an asteroid. A big one. Preferably anti-matter.
Nov 25, 2014 at 0:13 answer added Twelfth timeline score: 21
Nov 25, 2014 at 0:00 answer added Peteris timeline score: 2
Nov 24, 2014 at 23:59 comment added HDE 226868 @DJClayworth That could invalidate my answer. . .
Nov 24, 2014 at 23:57 answer added GreenAsJade timeline score: 1
Nov 24, 2014 at 23:43 comment added Monica Cellio @Rodrigo welcome to WorldBuilding. Please edit into the question any constraints on timeframe and collateral damage (e.g. do we need to protect animals? The planet?) into the question. Thanks.
Nov 24, 2014 at 23:26 answer added Physicist137 timeline score: 2
Nov 24, 2014 at 23:20 answer added DJClayworth timeline score: 4
Nov 24, 2014 at 23:15 comment added DJClayworth Is it a requirement that anything else survives? In other words, can I destroy the earth completely?
Nov 24, 2014 at 23:12 answer added HDE 226868 timeline score: 5
Nov 24, 2014 at 22:17 comment added HDE 226868 This has some odd phrasing, including the suicide reference. No offence, but this seems a little . . . terrorism-oriented. I'm sorry; I can't seem to put that any other way.
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:54 answer added MoritzLost timeline score: 5
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:38 answer added kaiser timeline score: 1
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:22 answer added Loren Pechtel timeline score: 1
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:19 comment added Sheraff Climate change is your answer
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:15 answer added GrandmasterB timeline score: 4
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:10 answer added Loren Pechtel timeline score: 2
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:01 answer added Henry Taylor timeline score: 2
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:00 comment added Rodrigo @Cragor, lol, I just didn't thought about time. But, I will live for the next 50 years. This is a limit :D
Nov 24, 2014 at 20:58 comment added Crabgor @Rodrigo : Assuming that was directed to me, I'll take that to mean you have no time limit, which means we can get creative!
Nov 24, 2014 at 20:57 comment added Rodrigo God don't say the things precisely! Did you read the bible? A lot of people understand a lot of things with the same text...
Nov 24, 2014 at 20:54 comment added Crabgor Sadly, it seems you've found a problem that simply answering "BOOM" wouldn't fix... Wait, what am I saying? BIGGER BOOM! On another note, do you have a time requirement for this, or can it be slow, over decades?
Nov 24, 2014 at 20:50 comment added Twelfth Adhere 'fricken' lasers to the heads of sharks.
Nov 24, 2014 at 20:48 review First posts
Nov 24, 2014 at 21:29
Nov 24, 2014 at 20:45 history asked Rodrigo CC BY-SA 3.0