Timeline for Would the revelation of Climate Control Technology to the Public render it unusable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 11:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Nov 24, 2014 at 14:20 | comment | added | Robert Boettcher | I love how you summarized the assumptions (indeed I didnt take into account whistleblower, which you now added to my consideration). The case for a Yes (telling everybody what I use as Empire A) is rather weak, since even unhappy groups becoming rebels might not stop or prevent the usage of the cryptomilitarics. However, the tremendous confusion of ones populace caused by the information, as lined out in the answer below, would be the biggest detriment to actually diverging such information. | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 3:16 | comment | added | James | Revolution is nothing more than change. Change is unstable yes. But also necessary for the evolution of mankind. Revolution and evolution are two parts of one process. | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 0:05 | comment | added | PipperChip | @James As seen by the number of investors flocking to places with unstable political climates, the progress made by warlords cooperating with each other and not exploiting individuals and communities... Yes, I'd say revolutions are generally bad for business, and bad for people. | |
| Nov 20, 2014 at 20:11 | comment | added | James | Revolution is neither inherently good or bad. | |
| Nov 18, 2014 at 19:50 | history | answered | PipperChip | CC BY-SA 3.0 |