Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 20, 2018 at 18:59 comment added John @subrunner 2 births per couple is not replacement it is a a population crash in a preindustrial species. Injury, predation, desease, ect will claim a large percentage of your population each generation.
May 11, 2016 at 20:34 vote accept JGaines
May 6, 2016 at 19:33 comment added Josh Gagnon It seems quite likely that rather than marry one man and mate with another, the women may marry each other and use a man simply as donor material. This already happens in our society, though obviously in a smaller percentage and with a lot less male corpses.
May 6, 2016 at 17:02 comment added Michael @SteveJessop "Still a better love story than Twilight"
May 6, 2016 at 15:55 comment added Cort Ammon @subrunner That's true, so long as you don't have deaths from anything else in life =) That ratio is pretty difficult to maintain in an evolution setting. Once a sentient species takes hold, however, that ratio could be enough.
May 6, 2016 at 13:56 comment added Bryan McClure I agree with you at first males would be little more than slaves what cultures evolve. Once males were given rights, sex of become highly ritualized. It's not unlikely than that something similar to marriage would evolve remember that person who have sex with has to be good enough to die for literally.
May 6, 2016 at 9:30 comment added Steve Jessop "that's about as complicated of a relationship as you can get" -- I've seen worse on Reddit relationships.
May 6, 2016 at 8:21 comment added subrunner 4 children is more than enough -- assuming that the male-to-female ratio is skewed in favor of the males. If 3 of 4 children are males, and you have an average of 2 children per pregnancy, then you can continue your race with only 2 pregnancies per female (and have 1 additional male left over)
May 6, 2016 at 4:10 history answered Cort Ammon CC BY-SA 3.0