Skip to main content
Corrected spelling & phrasing.
Source Link
Lostinfrance
  • 9.4k
  • 1
  • 31
  • 48

Disagree with the current interpretation of the US constitution

The best way is if there are issues with the US constitution that itthe state firmly disagrees againstwith. Or, to be more specific, that there must beare issues with gun laws, medical laws andor voting laws that that specific state wants but the US supreme court demees uconstuntinaldeems unconstitutional. Or if it refuses to ratify bills imposed by the federal government and the supreme court orders it to do it anyway.

So, yeah, the supreme court has ruled it impossible to leave the union, so in the story it needs to be that court that your state antagonizes the most. The state in question wants theretheir own interpretation of the constitution and askasks the commonwealth for help. Because you can't use ceding from the union as a way to get out of debt - that won't fly with basically every other nation out there. And having backers to support your case in UN really helps, of course.

Disagree with the current interpretation of the US constitution

The best way is if there are issues with the US constitution that it firmly disagrees against. Or to be more specific that there must be issues with gun laws, medical laws and voting laws that that specific state wants but the US supreme court demees uconstuntinal. Or if it refuses to ratify bills imposed by the federal government and the supreme court orders it to do it anyway.

So yeah the supreme court has ruled it impossible to leave the union so in the story it needs to be that court that your state antagonizes the most. The state in question wants there own interpretation of the constitution and ask the commonwealth for help. Because you can't use ceding from the union as a way to get out of debt that won't fly with basically every other nation out there. And having backers to support your case in UN really helps of course.

Disagree with the current interpretation of the US constitution

The best way is if there are issues with the US constitution that the state firmly disagrees with. Or, to be more specific, that there are issues with gun laws, medical laws or voting laws that that specific state wants but the US supreme court deems unconstitutional. Or if it refuses to ratify bills imposed by the federal government and the supreme court orders it to do it anyway.

So, yeah, the supreme court has ruled it impossible to leave the union, so in the story it needs to be that court that your state antagonizes the most. The state in question wants their own interpretation of the constitution and asks the commonwealth for help. Because you can't use ceding from the union as a way to get out of debt - that won't fly with basically every other nation out there. And having backers to support your case in UN really helps, of course.

Source Link
Mellester
  • 1.2k
  • 6
  • 6

Disagree with the current interpretation of the US constitution

The best way is if there are issues with the US constitution that it firmly disagrees against. Or to be more specific that there must be issues with gun laws, medical laws and voting laws that that specific state wants but the US supreme court demees uconstuntinal. Or if it refuses to ratify bills imposed by the federal government and the supreme court orders it to do it anyway.

So yeah the supreme court has ruled it impossible to leave the union so in the story it needs to be that court that your state antagonizes the most. The state in question wants there own interpretation of the constitution and ask the commonwealth for help. Because you can't use ceding from the union as a way to get out of debt that won't fly with basically every other nation out there. And having backers to support your case in UN really helps of course.