Timeline for Can a planet without one or more moons be habitable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2017 at 14:09 | answer | added | Ronald | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 16, 2016 at 20:44 | comment | added | user2284570 | @ThomasW : I recognize I forgot the source. It was on ʀᴍᴄ24 tv channel. They explained that without plate tectonics, earth wouldn’t have usable metal ore. | |
| Sep 16, 2016 at 5:40 | comment | added | ThomasW | @user2284570 I've never heard this before. Do you have any sources for that claim? | |
| Aug 28, 2016 at 11:25 | comment | added | user2284570 | @Split91 : just one thing without massive moon : no metal ore near surface, so no metal based tools. All tools would need to be stone based | |
| Mar 15, 2016 at 13:15 | vote | accept | Split91 | ||
| Mar 15, 2016 at 9:19 | answer | added | Separatrix | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 15, 2016 at 7:49 | answer | added | Lostinfrance | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 15, 2016 at 6:43 | answer | added | Youstay Igo | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 22:53 | comment | added | Xandar The Zenon | I don't see why not. I mean, tidepools aren't absolutely necessary for life, you could just as easily have stagnant shallow pools on the edge of oceans, instead of said pools. | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 22:00 | answer | added | ESL | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 21:42 | answer | added | Rob Watts | timeline score: 11 | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 21:19 | history | edited | HDE 226868♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Mar 14, 2016 at 21:11 | comment | added | Separatrix | There's no reason why it wouldn't be habitable, but I've heard a theory that it might not evolve life of its own without tidal regions. No sources right now, so only a comment. | |
| Mar 14, 2016 at 20:38 | history | asked | Split91 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |