Skip to main content
Added some info as requested by commenters. Should not have broken any answers.
Source Link
amziraro
  • 2.6k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 34

Imagine we have a faster-than-light drive which costs ~$250,000 USD per drive and can propel an ISS-sized craft at 1000 times the speed of light. It is reliable and has safeguards that stop it from plowing into things at high speed. How the FTL drive works is irrelevant; it could be an Alcubierre drive or powered by lalalaicanthearyouium.

The drive has its own included fuel/power supply which, for all intents and purposes, is infinite. (eg: unlimited or easily replenish-able, etc.) Additionally, this universe has no FTL communications other than mail carriers fitted with FTL drives.

Would there still be any value in building and operating (optical/radio/whatever) telescopes for (e.g.) locating exoplanets, studying stars, etc.?

Would telescopes be gradually retired and replaced by exploration ships?

Imagine we have a faster-than-light drive which costs ~$250,000 USD per drive and can propel an ISS-sized craft at 1000 times the speed of light. It is reliable and has safeguards that stop it from plowing into things at high speed. How the FTL drive works is irrelevant; it could be an Alcubierre drive or powered by lalalaicanthearyouium.

Would there still be any value in building and operating (optical/radio/whatever) telescopes for (e.g.) locating exoplanets, studying stars, etc.?

Would telescopes be gradually retired and replaced by exploration ships?

Imagine we have a faster-than-light drive which costs ~$250,000 USD per drive and can propel an ISS-sized craft at 1000 times the speed of light. It is reliable and has safeguards that stop it from plowing into things at high speed. How the FTL drive works is irrelevant; it could be an Alcubierre drive or powered by lalalaicanthearyouium.

The drive has its own included fuel/power supply which, for all intents and purposes, is infinite. (eg: unlimited or easily replenish-able, etc.) Additionally, this universe has no FTL communications other than mail carriers fitted with FTL drives.

Would there still be any value in building and operating (optical/radio/whatever) telescopes for (e.g.) locating exoplanets, studying stars, etc.?

Would telescopes be gradually retired and replaced by exploration ships?

added 2 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
HDE 226868
  • 101.7k
  • 25
  • 307
  • 544

Imagine we have a Faster Than Lightfaster-than-light drive which costs ~$250,000 USD per drive and can propel an ISS sized-sized craft at 1000 times the speed of light. It is reliable and has safeguards that stop it from plowing into things at high speed. How the FTL drive works is irrelevant,irrelevant; it could be an Alcubierre drive or powered by lalalaicanthearyouium.

Would there still be any value in building and operating (optical/radio/whatever) telescopes for (ege.g.) locating exoplanets, studying stars, etc.?
  

Would telescopes be gradually retired and replaced by exploration ships?

Imagine we have a Faster Than Light drive which costs ~$250,000 USD per drive and can propel an ISS sized craft at 1000 times the speed of light. It is reliable and has safeguards that stop it from plowing into things at high speed. How the FTL drive works is irrelevant, it could be an Alcubierre drive or powered by lalalaicanthearyouium.

Would there still be any value in building and operating (optical/radio/whatever) telescopes for (eg) locating exoplanets, studying stars, etc?
 Would telescopes be gradually retired and replaced by exploration ships?

Imagine we have a faster-than-light drive which costs ~$250,000 USD per drive and can propel an ISS-sized craft at 1000 times the speed of light. It is reliable and has safeguards that stop it from plowing into things at high speed. How the FTL drive works is irrelevant; it could be an Alcubierre drive or powered by lalalaicanthearyouium.

Would there still be any value in building and operating (optical/radio/whatever) telescopes for (e.g.) locating exoplanets, studying stars, etc.? 

Would telescopes be gradually retired and replaced by exploration ships?

Source Link
amziraro
  • 2.6k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 34

Would 'cheap' FTL make powerful telescopes obsolete?

Imagine we have a Faster Than Light drive which costs ~$250,000 USD per drive and can propel an ISS sized craft at 1000 times the speed of light. It is reliable and has safeguards that stop it from plowing into things at high speed. How the FTL drive works is irrelevant, it could be an Alcubierre drive or powered by lalalaicanthearyouium.

Would there still be any value in building and operating (optical/radio/whatever) telescopes for (eg) locating exoplanets, studying stars, etc?
Would telescopes be gradually retired and replaced by exploration ships?