Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 20, 2016 at 9:24 comment added phresnel @corsiKa: Yes, not because it's natural, but driven exactly to that by research and economy. There were/are times where Moore's Law could have been beaten, and times in which not. Moore's law and the keeping-up of its validity is human driven, not driven by nature. It would be strange otherwise, if you think about it. See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… . Likewise, life spans have always increased and decreased. And even if we became highlanders, with growing age grows the probability to have a deadly accident/illness.
Jan 19, 2016 at 18:26 comment added corsiKa @phresnel They said Moore's law would have diminishing returns too, 50 years later it's still going strong.
Jan 19, 2016 at 13:32 comment added phresnel @corsiKa: Nature is almost never linear, though.
Jan 19, 2016 at 12:05 comment added Max Williams The current increasing of lifespan is really about keeping old people alive for longer: it doesn't tackle aging as such. However, i do think that genetic research is likely to "cure" aging within the next 100 years.
Jan 18, 2016 at 20:35 comment added corsiKa Given our current rate of increasing lifespan, it's only a matter of time until we've solved that pesky death problem too.
Jan 18, 2016 at 18:39 history answered AndyD273 CC BY-SA 3.0