Timeline for Defining and Balancing Entropic Magic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2015 at 20:16 | history | rollback | DoubleDouble |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Dec 22, 2015 at 20:15 | comment | added | Trismegistus | I'll ask another question. | |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 18:46 | comment | added | Trismegistus | @DoubleDouble I made my edits, also what do you think whould be a better title. | |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 18:45 | history | edited | Trismegistus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 427 characters in body
|
| Dec 22, 2015 at 15:49 | comment | added | DoubleDouble | If you want more focus on affecting probability, you may want to edit it out of this question and make it a separate one. I think it would do better that way if you are looking for ideas on it, since this question seems focused around "Defining and Balancing" the element in general. | |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 0:34 | history | edited | Brythan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo fixes.
|
| Dec 21, 2015 at 23:15 | comment | added | Trismegistus | Without going back and changing the metaphysics of magic then yes. I went with elements because more abstract magic system gave me nothing but headaches. | |
| Dec 21, 2015 at 23:09 | answer | added | Ninety-Three | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 21, 2015 at 22:45 | history | edited | Trismegistus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 21, 2015 at 22:39 | answer | added | DoubleDouble | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 21, 2015 at 21:10 | comment | added | DoubleDouble | Should your 5 elements all be considered set in stone? You may consider Entropy (or "decay" magic) being a category of elemental magic, (Opposite of Genesis, or "generating" magic) - rather than an element itself. | |
| Dec 21, 2015 at 20:29 | answer | added | Cort Ammon | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 21, 2015 at 20:04 | history | asked | Trismegistus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |