Timeline for Can we breathe the moon's crust?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2014 at 6:36 | comment | added | Kromey | The Project Artemis people seem to think so. Even if not, though, that's not going to add a huge amount of excess bulk anyway. | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 22:51 | comment | added | Loren Pechtel | @Kromey In something the size of a briefcase??? | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 7:07 | comment | added | Kromey | The device described by the Artemis Project uses solar reflectors for heat and photovoltaic panels for electricity, both of which do seem to be included. | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 2:50 | comment | added | Loren Pechtel | @Kromey It comes down to whether the cracker or the oxygen is heavier. If the process celtschk refers to works it's obvious the cracker is lighter if you have enough power (his device obviously don't contain it's power source.) | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 2:34 | comment | added | Kromey | But you need to bring either the O2 or the CO2 with you under that scenario. If you can mine the O2 (or the CO2, for that matter) after you get there, that's less mass you have to bring in the first place. | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 1:40 | history | answered | Loren Pechtel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |