Timeline for Reality check: energy source for power armour
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 5 at 10:36 | comment | added | FrogOfJuly | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
Dec 5 at 10:29 | comment | added | Hobbamok | Added a tl:dr though, hope that helps | |
Dec 5 at 10:25 | history | edited | Hobbamok | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 167 characters in body
|
Dec 5 at 10:18 | comment | added | FrogOfJuly | I not trying to be mean or anything, but I had to read your answer several times to get what you mean precisely. (In combination with your comments elsewhere) Maybe a more thorough explanation would benefit. The Idea, if I got it correctly, has a lot of potential | |
Dec 5 at 10:16 | comment | added | FrogOfJuly | I get it now! This is indeed a nice idea. One can use a subcritical fissile fuel that can be removed from the moderation vessel off-mission and thus "turned off". It is still an RTG-like device, but with more control. It is indeed an upgrade from the polonium design. | |
Dec 5 at 8:29 | comment | added | Hobbamok | [edit for comment] 30kg nuke, now edited to 25kg | |
Dec 5 at 8:28 | history | edited | Hobbamok | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 537 characters in body
|
Dec 4 at 15:01 | comment | added | FrogOfJuly | In order to have a space Geneva Conventions our civilisation needs at least one Great Space War. However, I whole-heartedly believe that with Expanse-like level of technology we will not survive such event as a species :) The thing concerning reactors though, is that they are big, need a lot of cooling(nightmare for breach action), have a lot of moving parts, require shielding and, with certain designs, are capable of reaching critical mass. This is alright for ghost-in-the-shell style tanks, spaceships or even for certain mech suite configurations. I like these, but they are no power armour:( | |
Dec 4 at 12:18 | history | answered | Hobbamok | CC BY-SA 4.0 |