Timeline for Is is plausible that we could have neuronal maps of human brains without mind uploading being possible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
29 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 at 1:08 | answer | added | TLW | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 24 at 12:04 | history | protected | Monty Wild♦ | ||
| Nov 24 at 11:58 | answer | added | Aaargh Zombies | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 24 at 2:54 | answer | added | Gnosis | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 23 at 22:44 | answer | added | Dale M | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 23 at 22:38 | answer | added | Dale M | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 23 at 16:39 | comment | added | Corbin | A standard reply, too short for an answer: the no-cloning theorem forbids brain scans that are exact and non-destructive. Your setting would need to criminalize destructive brain scans, which could be interesting to the narrative. | |
| S Nov 22 at 21:31 | vote | accept | Nethesis | ||
| Nov 22 at 17:54 | comment | added | Nosajimiki | @JohnO Not necessarily, it just means that the human mind is more than the form of our brains which is already scientifically proven on several levels. | |
| Nov 22 at 17:25 | answer | added | Nosajimiki | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 22 at 17:12 | comment | added | Seggan | There's always the metaphysical cop-out of "there's something more to human minds than the brain" | |
| Nov 22 at 16:38 | answer | added | Robert Rapplean | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 22 at 16:33 | comment | added | John O | This would require that human minds aren't Turing-computable. Whatever that would mean. | |
| Nov 22 at 16:21 | answer | added | Trioxidane | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 22 at 13:44 | comment | added | Stef | We were drawing maps of the world a long, long time before we were building video games and simulators. We're already capable of scanning a human brain. But it's still gonna be a long, long time until we can simulate a human brain. Note we're also already capable of sequencing the human genome, ie making a map of human DNA; but it's also gonna be a long long time until we can simulate a human body given the DNA. | |
| Nov 22 at 12:47 | answer | added | Alot | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 22 at 9:53 | answer | added | Toph | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 22 at 2:52 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Nov 22 at 2:07 | comment | added | Flywheel25a | I don't have enough scientific basis for a proper answer, but I think the analog vs. digital issue could also be a factor. The world is analog, our computers are digital. | |
| Nov 22 at 0:48 | answer | added | g s | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 21 at 22:47 | vote | accept | Nethesis | ||
| S Nov 22 at 21:31 | |||||
| Nov 21 at 22:25 | answer | added | Gault Drakkor | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 21 at 22:16 | answer | added | John | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 21 at 21:34 | answer | added | Richard Kirk | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 21 at 20:14 | answer | added | planetmaker | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 21 at 19:39 | answer | added | AlexP | timeline score: 16 | |
| Nov 21 at 19:20 | answer | added | Gene | timeline score: 25 | |
| S Nov 21 at 18:51 | review | First questions | |||
| Nov 21 at 18:52 | |||||
| S Nov 21 at 18:51 | history | asked | Nethesis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |