Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 7 at 21:18 comment added Asterion @JBH I'm starting to think that's the way to go! Thanks for the pointers, I'll be sure to follow them more closely going forward!
Oct 7 at 10:15 answer added Slarty timeline score: 1
Oct 7 at 7:07 answer added Radovan Garabík timeline score: 1
Oct 6 at 21:42 comment added AlexP @FlightDeck0112: The better word would be distinct, wouldn't it?
Oct 6 at 21:40 comment added FlightDeck0112 @AlexP Discrete can also refer to the context of the entire spatial dimension being discrete from the one we experience, not just numerical values within it. That feels more logical than stretching to discreet.
Oct 5 at 14:11 answer added Mark Foskey timeline score: 2
S Oct 5 at 4:59 history suggested IconDaemon CC BY-SA 4.0
Formatting for clarity
Oct 5 at 1:37 history protected Monty Wild
Oct 4 at 21:23 comment added JBH BTW, for future reference you're allowed to ask one and only one question per post (asking multiple questions is specifically a reason to close questions) and you're not allowed to start a discussion. Questions are expected to follow a one-specific-question/one-best-answer model. For more information, please carefully read our tour and the following three Help Center pages: help center, help center and How to Ask. Thanks.
Oct 4 at 21:20 comment added JBH ... The wonderful thing about there not being a 4th D that we know of is that you're writing all of the rules governing how things in the other 3D interact with it... if at all. Personally, I'd invite you to spend more time here and less time talking with your physics-minded friends because your world is governed by imagination and theirs by immutable laws.
Oct 4 at 21:18 comment added JBH If all particles can move not only on the x, y, and z axis... your physics-minded friends have led you astray. It's like saying a shadow has trouble forming because light can move in three dimensions. Some particles flow along magnetic field lines in 3D, but what if magnetism cannot transcend into the 4th D? What happens to a group of special particles unknown to science today that can exist in all 4D but also interact with magnetic field lines and it meets two magnetic fields that are perpendicular to one another in the 4th D? (Cool!) ... (*Continued*)
Oct 4 at 21:09 review Suggested edits
S Oct 5 at 4:59
Oct 4 at 18:28 answer added user369070 timeline score: 4
Oct 4 at 17:29 comment added Asterion @AlexP Perhaps? To be honest, I only heard this while talking with said physicist friend, and thus may have made many terminology errors. I'm kind of going for the "detached" sense of the word? Either way, I'm just throwing around possibilities to try and make sense of a fifth dimension.
Oct 4 at 14:00 answer added xryl669 timeline score: 1
Oct 4 at 11:39 history became hot network question
Oct 4 at 10:29 answer added Monty Wild timeline score: 8
Oct 4 at 10:09 answer added Trioxidane timeline score: 3
Oct 4 at 8:27 comment added AlexP A discrete spatial dimension (one on which a particle could take only specific positions, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...) would be completely incompatible with all the mathematical background of physics. Did you mean a discreet dimension?
Oct 4 at 6:57 review Close votes
Oct 11 at 3:01
Oct 4 at 6:38 answer added L.Dutch timeline score: 6
Oct 4 at 4:54 answer added g s timeline score: 34
Oct 4 at 4:01 answer added Daniel B timeline score: 8
Oct 4 at 3:46 history edited Asterion
edited tags
S Oct 4 at 3:38 review First questions
Oct 4 at 3:44
S Oct 4 at 3:38 history asked Asterion CC BY-SA 4.0