Timeline for Concocting a fourth spatial dimension that can support wormhole-like travel and not mess up life?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
26 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 7 at 21:18 | comment | added | Asterion | @JBH I'm starting to think that's the way to go! Thanks for the pointers, I'll be sure to follow them more closely going forward! | |
Oct 7 at 10:15 | answer | added | Slarty | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 7 at 7:07 | answer | added | Radovan Garabík | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 6 at 21:42 | comment | added | AlexP | @FlightDeck0112: The better word would be distinct, wouldn't it? | |
Oct 6 at 21:40 | comment | added | FlightDeck0112 | @AlexP Discrete can also refer to the context of the entire spatial dimension being discrete from the one we experience, not just numerical values within it. That feels more logical than stretching to discreet. | |
Oct 5 at 14:11 | answer | added | Mark Foskey | timeline score: 2 | |
S Oct 5 at 4:59 | history | suggested | IconDaemon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Formatting for clarity
|
Oct 5 at 1:37 | history | protected | Monty Wild♦ | ||
Oct 4 at 21:23 | comment | added | JBH | BTW, for future reference you're allowed to ask one and only one question per post (asking multiple questions is specifically a reason to close questions) and you're not allowed to start a discussion. Questions are expected to follow a one-specific-question/one-best-answer model. For more information, please carefully read our tour and the following three Help Center pages: help center, help center and How to Ask. Thanks. | |
Oct 4 at 21:20 | comment | added | JBH | ... The wonderful thing about there not being a 4th D that we know of is that you're writing all of the rules governing how things in the other 3D interact with it... if at all. Personally, I'd invite you to spend more time here and less time talking with your physics-minded friends because your world is governed by imagination and theirs by immutable laws. | |
Oct 4 at 21:18 | comment | added | JBH |
If all particles can move not only on the x, y, and z axis... your physics-minded friends have led you astray. It's like saying a shadow has trouble forming because light can move in three dimensions. Some particles flow along magnetic field lines in 3D, but what if magnetism cannot transcend into the 4th D? What happens to a group of special particles unknown to science today that can exist in all 4D but also interact with magnetic field lines and it meets two magnetic fields that are perpendicular to one another in the 4th D? (Cool!) ... (*Continued*)
|
|
Oct 4 at 21:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 5 at 4:59 | |||||
Oct 4 at 18:28 | answer | added | user369070 | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 4 at 17:29 | comment | added | Asterion | @AlexP Perhaps? To be honest, I only heard this while talking with said physicist friend, and thus may have made many terminology errors. I'm kind of going for the "detached" sense of the word? Either way, I'm just throwing around possibilities to try and make sense of a fifth dimension. | |
Oct 4 at 14:00 | answer | added | xryl669 | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 4 at 11:39 | history | became hot network question | |||
Oct 4 at 10:29 | answer | added | Monty Wild♦ | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 4 at 10:09 | answer | added | Trioxidane | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 4 at 8:27 | comment | added | AlexP | A discrete spatial dimension (one on which a particle could take only specific positions, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...) would be completely incompatible with all the mathematical background of physics. Did you mean a discreet dimension? | |
Oct 4 at 6:57 | review | Close votes | |||
Oct 11 at 3:01 | |||||
Oct 4 at 6:38 | answer | added | L.Dutch♦ | timeline score: 6 | |
Oct 4 at 4:54 | answer | added | g s | timeline score: 34 | |
Oct 4 at 4:01 | answer | added | Daniel B | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 4 at 3:46 | history | edited | Asterion |
edited tags
|
|
S Oct 4 at 3:38 | review | First questions | |||
Oct 4 at 3:44 | |||||
S Oct 4 at 3:38 | history | asked | Asterion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |