Timeline for Primitive drawing of blood
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2 at 2:21 | comment | added | John | Once or many times? And without killing the person is going to be a gamble no matter what without sterile tools. | |
| Apr 2 at 1:31 | vote | accept | Jim Clay | ||
| Apr 1 at 1:27 | answer | added | elemtilas | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 1 at 0:30 | comment | added | Jim Clay | @AlexP Thorns are a good idea. Thanks for that. Regarding rocks being sharp- often not as much as you think. It's often surprisingly hard to cut through stuff. I once watched a man try to put a cow out of its misery after it was hit by a train. He tried to cut its throat with a knife, and no matter how hard he leaned in, could not get the knife to puncture the skin. Granted we are not cows, but you get the point. | |
| Apr 1 at 0:30 | comment | added | Jim Clay | Sorry for any vagueness. I want to find a way to extract non-trivial amounts of blood (think a pint or more) without killing the person, and having no technology. | |
| Mar 31 at 21:17 | comment | added | AlexP | In fairy tales, the canonical no-metal no-stone method of having the fair princess shed a little blood is to prick her delicate rosy finger on a rose prickle... And anyway, if rocks are available, I just don't see the problem -- broken rocks have sharp edges, don't they? | |
| Mar 31 at 20:39 | comment | added | Fallenspacerock | @Jim Clay you should maybe clarify what you want as it's kind of hard to figure out what you are asking. | |
| Mar 31 at 20:36 | answer | added | Trioxidane | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 31 at 20:35 | comment | added | M S | Nothing derived from plants? Only rocks? | |
| S Mar 31 at 20:20 | review | First questions | |||
| Mar 31 at 20:51 | |||||
| S Mar 31 at 20:20 | history | asked | Jim Clay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |