Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 26, 2023 at 23:53 vote accept user98816
Jun 3, 2023 at 4:54 comment added lilHar I mean, technically you could have it powerless if you built it like a wide-brim receiver dish.
Jun 2, 2023 at 14:58 comment added MichaelK @MatthieuM. Well, as I said: providing the primary power to the light source would demand some pretty high capacity power generation. Just turning some mirrors would require a lot less. C.f. SmartFlower, that powers its own motors to stay aligned with the sun.
Jun 2, 2023 at 14:52 comment added Matthieu M. I agree with your analysis (minuscule and self-powered). I'm just not sure why the OP specified "powerless" -- if they have any odd reasons.
Jun 2, 2023 at 14:39 comment added MichaelK @MatthieuM. I am applying the assumption that OP meant that the main source of the light was not something that needs power. That the infrastructure of the light source is powered and controlled, I would assume being quite acceptable, since that power requirement would be minuscule in comparison to trying to power the light itself. And in any case, it would be a sinch to make this into a self-powering/self-regulating system, using the incoming sunlight to power the movement of the mirror array, either through photovoltaics or sealed pneumatics (such systems exist today).
Jun 2, 2023 at 14:30 comment added Matthieu M. It's not quite powerless, when you need a computer to track the sun and actuators to orient the mirror, but it's pretty good bang for your buck for sure.
Jun 1, 2023 at 11:53 history edited MichaelK CC BY-SA 4.0
added 525 characters in body
Jun 1, 2023 at 11:35 history answered MichaelK CC BY-SA 4.0