Timeline for Would it make more sense to terraform a planet with a single climate or multiple varieties of climate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 10, 2023 at 20:36 | answer | added | Tyson Dennis | timeline score: 2 | |
May 10, 2023 at 11:02 | comment | added | Kal Madda | @rek Thank you, I guess I thought Mars was all desert, because several times in my research I saw Mars referred to as a desert planet. But now that you mention it, frozen poles make some sense. | |
May 10, 2023 at 4:24 | comment | added | rek | What you've missed is that there's no such thing as a single climate planet. That's not how solar input across a spherical surface works. Even as a 'dead' planet Mars has more than one climate – it has frozen poles and a temperate equator. | |
May 10, 2023 at 2:54 | vote | accept | Kal Madda | ||
May 10, 2023 at 2:40 | answer | added | KerrAvon2055 | timeline score: 2 | |
May 10, 2023 at 2:29 | comment | added | Robert Rapplean | Mars isn't a single-environment planet, it's a dead planet. No ecosystem whatsoever. That's true of any planet where there's no liquid water. It might be possible to have biomes based on some other solvent, but not human habitable ones. | |
May 10, 2023 at 2:29 | answer | added | Martamo | timeline score: 3 | |
May 10, 2023 at 2:24 | answer | added | Robert Rapplean | timeline score: 5 | |
May 10, 2023 at 2:00 | comment | added | Kal Madda | @AncientGiantPottedPlant I just added some details to my question. Hopefully that helps? Thanks for the advice, I’m trying to be as clear as I can. | |
May 10, 2023 at 1:59 | history | edited | Kal Madda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I added additional details.
|
May 10, 2023 at 1:16 | comment | added | user86462 | @KalMadda Without knowing more details and what single climate it is, on what sort of planet, it's impossible to say. Please add more details to avoid this question getting closed. | |
May 10, 2023 at 0:26 | review | Close votes | |||
May 11, 2023 at 21:50 | |||||
May 10, 2023 at 0:01 | comment | added | Gault Drakkor | I suspect planet of hats trope is in effect. That is easier to say planet of X vs the the complexities there would reasonably be. | |
May 9, 2023 at 23:57 | history | edited | Gault Drakkor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
split into two paragraphs
|
May 9, 2023 at 23:55 | history | reopened |
Kal Madda Robert Rapplean Joachim Starfish Prime Gault Drakkor |
||
May 8, 2023 at 20:12 | comment | added | Kal Madda | That other question you linked doesn’t answer my question. I’m not asking whether single-climate planets are possible (look at Mars, clearly they are possible), I’m asking about whether it would be more likely that artificially terraformed planets would be single-climate (like Mars) or multi-climate (like Earth). So I can see why you thought it was similar (it’s kind of related) but it definitely is not the same question, and so none of the answers there are actually very useful to me. | |
S May 8, 2023 at 20:07 | review | Reopen votes | |||
May 9, 2023 at 23:55 | |||||
S May 8, 2023 at 20:07 | history | edited | Kal Madda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I clarified that I’m asking which method would be the most practical for the terraformers to choose?
Added to review
|
May 8, 2023 at 19:28 | history | edited | L.Dutch♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
May 8, 2023 at 18:58 | history | closed |
rek L.Dutch♦ internal-consistency Users with the internal-consistency badge or a synonym can single-handedly close internal-consistency questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. |
Duplicate of Are geographically typed planets realistic? | |
May 8, 2023 at 18:48 | history | asked | Kal Madda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |