Timeline for Genetics of a human-animal hybrid
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2023 at 7:35 | vote | accept | user98816 | ||
| Feb 20, 2023 at 15:29 | comment | added | Harry Mu | I mean historically, scientific and legal definitions were pretty much random. Like the 3/5ths thing in the US constitution. There is no reason for a government to honor a precise scientific definition if it is not useful or otherwise beneficial. | |
| Feb 20, 2023 at 7:50 | comment | added | Negdo | @HarryMu You are under asumption that there is no connection between scientific and legal definitions. Because they are. And this is not a definition that is obscure, it is something children in elementary school learn, which mean ignoring it is harder. | |
| Feb 18, 2023 at 23:43 | comment | added | Harry Mu | >You said that Metamorphs don't have human rights because they don't count as human. But here lies a problem: by definition they ARE human if they can produce viable offsprings with them ---quote end--- I think they meant legal definition of human rather than scientific definition of human when designating human rights. | |
| Feb 17, 2023 at 9:30 | history | answered | Negdo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |