Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 25, 2022 at 14:19 vote accept tbelle9
Apr 25, 2022 at 14:19
Apr 24, 2022 at 3:14 comment added Jamie L. Yes, we know what simple means, and ascribing that to nomads is a problem, whether you meant it neutrally or not. The OP could absolutely say this culture's music is obnoxiously complicated to outsiders, because either 1) like many nomads, they trek through other countries and mixed-and-matched styles, or 2) storytelling/music is their main entertainment, because how else do you cheer up cranky kids or footsore companions? "Wow, this ten-minute epic ballad is great! Oh wait, it's from Nomad-Group. They forgot to learn the SECOND HALF. bangs head against wall"
Apr 23, 2022 at 13:36 comment added Wyvern123 I agree with both of these comments. However, I meant 'simple' as in not virtuosic and flashy. I also agree with the adaptability of the culture, but I envision it as starting musical style, not a step up from another group. This group would undoubtedly be able to adapt, but I imagine that this group has remained isolated from other culture's music. But both of these comments are technically correct--I do not deny that.
Apr 23, 2022 at 0:13 comment added Jamie L. Speaking as a singer/actor, the human voice alone gets EXTREMELY versatile, so why would this culture's music automatically be "simple" and "primitive?" The Inuit people's Wikipedia page mentions that while they didn't have a strong musical tradition because it was mainly used for religion/spirituality, they adopted foreign music very quickly. Unless the OP's culture subscribes to the "primitive savage" stereotypes, you can adapt all sorts of hand-held instruments for a people on the move.
Apr 22, 2022 at 22:35 comment added user9182 Why does them being a nomad-like group mean that the music will be fairly simple?
Apr 22, 2022 at 15:52 vote accept tbelle9
Apr 24, 2022 at 15:01
Apr 22, 2022 at 13:33 history answered Wyvern123 CC BY-SA 4.0