Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 10, 2022 at 15:53 comment added toolforger I suppose that's why there's a question in the first place :-)
Jan 9, 2022 at 14:10 comment added Sascha @toolforger: Well. I am not sure how long that development may or may not take - it could be that the boundary conditions (e.g. weight/propellant needs) required the landing vehicles to be air breathing. If you just assume that the question meant "they can call the home planet to develop something to take off, and wait until that is finished", the no planet will be safe against leaving it.
Jan 8, 2022 at 20:04 comment added toolforger in that case, the next landing spacecraft would not be using an airbreather and rescue the people. That's not the scenario the question talks about.
Jan 7, 2022 at 17:41 comment added Sascha @toolforger: That depends if you use an air breathing engine (e.g. a scramjet) or not.
Jan 7, 2022 at 15:43 comment added toolforger Flame retardant wouldn't work. The relevant combustion happens inside the nozzle, where all atmospheric gases are blown out; what happens to the flame after it has left the nozzle is irrelevant to the propulsion.
Jan 4, 2022 at 23:05 history answered Sascha CC BY-SA 4.0