Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 19, 2021 at 23:27 comment added user91827 @jamesqf You're correct. Willik's answer doesn't answer my question.
Dec 8, 2021 at 3:38 comment added jamesqf @Willk: But a simple currency change like that doesn't really answer the question, since it specifies a crash. Revaluing the dollar shouldn't cause a crash, if done right. Compare to the Y2K disaster that didn't happen because a lot of people worked hard and fixed most of the problems beforehand.
Dec 7, 2021 at 15:48 comment added Willk The crux of the question is that OP asks for a number value and implies it must be for an exciting reason.
Dec 7, 2021 at 15:41 comment added Justin Thyme the Second @ jamesqf The crux of the argument depends of the definition of 'crash'. Is it a true devaluation in value, or just a change in the number and the units?
Dec 7, 2021 at 15:28 comment added Willk @jamesqf - I appreciate your summary. Your observation is why my answer is the most likely explanation for S&P 700. It is like noting that jamesqf used to be 183 tall and now is 1.83 tall . HOW DID HE SHRINK?? Dr Shrinker is a possibility. The most likely explanation is that he did not but units were changed; "heavy lira" but the Italians are not poorer. The number value for S&P is a construct and if it changes drastically the most likely reason is that it was changed on purpose.
Dec 7, 2021 at 6:12 comment added jamesqf That doesn't change the actual value of the stocks, though. It's just like quoting prices in Japanese yen instead of dollars.
Dec 7, 2021 at 2:57 history answered Willk CC BY-SA 4.0