Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 3, 2021 at 22:13 vote accept KEY_ABRADE
Sep 3, 2021 at 21:34 answer added KombatAce timeline score: 1
Sep 2, 2021 at 12:41 answer added Kyo timeline score: 4
Sep 1, 2021 at 21:48 comment added KEY_ABRADE @Alexander Go ahead and do either - I said AFV, not necessarily tracked/wheeled or mecha.
Sep 1, 2021 at 21:34 comment added Alexander @KEY_ABRADE I see. Do you want a traditional tracked/wheeled machine, or we should improvise and make it a mecha?
Sep 1, 2021 at 20:56 comment added KEY_ABRADE @Alexander Suppression of rebel/insurgent forces in heavily mountainous terrain.
Sep 1, 2021 at 20:01 comment added Alexander What would be the tactical role of this AFV? I presume it should be a main battle tank, but I see that you are staring from M2 Bradley example.
Sep 1, 2021 at 19:09 answer added Willk timeline score: 3
Sep 1, 2021 at 18:56 comment added KEY_ABRADE @Cadence Crew members are capable of performing maintenance more effectively, cannot be effected by electronic countermeasures, and provide "man-in-the-loop" capability. Modern-tech AIs might make very dangerous/war-crimey decisions, and are vulnerable to errors (for instance, classifying a dog as a cat), which is why there are 5 of the things in charge of navigation rather than one. They're there to carry out repetitive tasks that would otherwise eat up the crew member's time/energy.
Sep 1, 2021 at 18:09 comment added Cadence If you're using AI mediation to turn the high-level crew member decisions into specific actions, why do they need to be present? Why not a drone?
Sep 1, 2021 at 17:54 history edited KEY_ABRADE CC BY-SA 4.0
added 296 characters in body
Sep 1, 2021 at 17:49 history asked KEY_ABRADE CC BY-SA 4.0