Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 29, 2021 at 3:40 comment added jamesqf @AlexP: Yes, but a lot of people keep insisting that things which are blue through structural coloration aren't REALLY blue.
Aug 28, 2021 at 16:47 comment added AlexP @jamesqf: Blue at macro scale is not necessarily different from blue at molecular scales, except in so much that all colors are different at molecular scales. There are quite a few animals and very many plants which make honest-to-goodness blue pigments; and there are situations where colors other than blue are obtained by structural interference. And, of course, not all photosynthetic pigments are green.
Aug 28, 2021 at 16:13 comment added jamesqf @AlexP: Or indeed, why blue at the structural scale is fundamentally different from blue at the molecular scale? Except that you can't conveniently grind up butterfly scales or peacock feathers and use them as blue paint.
Aug 28, 2021 at 15:12 answer added Willk timeline score: 1
Aug 27, 2021 at 19:41 answer added LiveInAmbeR timeline score: 2
Aug 27, 2021 at 12:34 comment added DWKraus I have to agree with AlexP. Kind of definitionally, it's a pigment if it absorbs light in the way you are describing. If it scatters light instead, it's not absorbing it and retaining the energy.
Aug 27, 2021 at 6:17 comment added AlexP "Microscopic structures that trap light": I am not sure that I understand what is it that you think photosynthetic pigments are, if not microscopic structures that trap light.
Aug 27, 2021 at 5:50 comment added rek You've asked three questions, you may want to rephrase.
Aug 27, 2021 at 4:58 history edited L.Dutch
edited tags
Aug 27, 2021 at 4:43 answer added L.Dutch timeline score: 7
Aug 27, 2021 at 4:32 history asked Anders Gustafson CC BY-SA 4.0