Timeline for Would pleopod swimming scale?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 14, 2021 at 8:08 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
Aug 9, 2021 at 3:18 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 806 characters in body
|
Aug 9, 2021 at 3:12 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 806 characters in body
|
Aug 9, 2021 at 3:06 | comment | added | John | @rek I also added more to the body of the answer. | |
Aug 9, 2021 at 3:06 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 806 characters in body
|
Aug 9, 2021 at 2:53 | comment | added | John | @rek sure, it is awful efficacy wise, it still works, it just leaves with the choice between fast and incredibly inefficient or slow inefficient. lobsters use it for quick get away bursts, pleopods extend the "burst" phase by having multiple flaps, but there is still an extended recovery phase were the animal is just coasting and slowing down. the fish system lets you put in less effort continuously, because most or all of the motion is generating thrust, and the cycle is symmetric without a recovery phase were a lot of the generated thrust is lost. | |
Aug 8, 2021 at 21:32 | comment | added | rek | Re: 'Drag swimming is good enough for a get away but for a habitual swimmer it is awful' – the motion in the isopod video I linked doesn't suggest it's only good for short distances or quick bursts (it even holds up to additional weight from the prey), so could you expand on this point a bit? | |
Aug 8, 2021 at 20:45 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
Aug 8, 2021 at 20:38 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
Aug 8, 2021 at 20:32 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
Aug 8, 2021 at 20:24 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
Aug 8, 2021 at 20:19 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
Aug 8, 2021 at 20:11 | history | answered | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |