Timeline for Are cloaking clothes physical feasible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 4, 2021 at 5:24 | comment | added | user64888 | @nick012000 So the plan is to walk around with a giant water dropper system and projectors? Won't people know you are there when they feel water on their heads? All those systems work in a static preset state. Holograms that use light, for example, require a container and super cooled gas. Moving the projector requires you to move the container, and people will notice the container when it hits them. | |
Aug 4, 2021 at 5:18 | comment | added | nick012000 | "360 degree programmable lights that can be customized to change the light shown at each angle down to less than a degree. They must have a refresh rate of over 200 times a second." 3D visualization technology exists, you know. For instance, there's the water droplet projection system used by the Vocaloid concerts. | |
Aug 4, 2021 at 4:23 | comment | added | user64888 | Nanomachines would not be inherently better than miniaturized electronics. You only need the parts to be a little less than a millimeter in size. Reducing the size a thousand times more won't help. Further more, this means in addition to all the things above you need to add nanotechnology to that. | |
Aug 3, 2021 at 20:47 | comment | added | MolbOrg | Where is nanomachines son in this answer. Not that nanotechnology is answer to any question, but here it definetly one of the directions. | |
Aug 3, 2021 at 20:02 | history | edited | user64888 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
adding weight and form factor concerns
|
Aug 3, 2021 at 19:31 | history | answered | user64888 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |