If your guys do not clean, carve out, flush out, whatever the aiAI from the system is, it does not matter whichwhat means they use to control parts of previous system - they may use typewriterztypewriters, ride aroudaround on stone bikes, whatever, all of that does not matter as long as they do not understand the system and clean the parts where aithe AI may be.
Okay, they use perforated paper to program a sequence on a steam pressure cooker - what has itthat to do with the aiAI inside of it and wifiit using WiFi as an integrated part of aithe AI version of an IOT, where heit stores its hidden backupbackups - nothjngnothing, it has nothing. Yeah it may be sloooow there(or may be not), but it does not mean it can't strike.
Okay, pressure cooker maybe a far stretched - universal matter synthesiser, how much brain it can have - itit's probably a complex machine, and what if it controls the only source of food hereonboard. Navigation, engines, reactor, electricity smart routing boxes, load distribution system, life support, etc. Maybe the ai isAI has a distributed system onof its own, in every preeurepreasure cooker there is a little bit of it - even though there is no information about that in the qquestion.
A space ship it is a system of connected complex machines and it has to work in particular way, coherent, at proper speeds and feeds, you just can't shove random equipment with different specs and expect for eveythingeverything work fine in. In cases ifof it makesmaking some real work and not just acting as an interface.
Replacing peripheral interface does nothing, replacing core equipment breaks coherence of the system, making a big question - can it still work or not, and most likely not, how fast it breaks, will it blow up (not a trivial question, very important for a rocket, I guess for a space ship also a legitlegitimate concern).
- there is a similar/different less significant compatibility problem - its name is "porting software between windows linux macos" - you guessed it, it is pain in the rear for anything more complex than some applet, with all the expirience and libraries for cross compiling - it still does not work the same.
There is a similar/different/less significant compatibility problem - its name is "porting software between Windows Linux MacOS" - you guessed it, it is pain in the rear for anything more complex than some applet, with all the experience and libraries for cross compiling - it still does not always work the same.
And here uyou throw guys into a system they do not know and wish to replace stuff randomly and rewrite stuff from scratch - it requires a lot of time and a lot of human resources and is not necessarlynecessarily possible, and you will need to make equipment/hardware from scratch as well, at least interfaces (which are not necesarlynecessarily helpful, as I said earlier) and not always possible - why is way beyond the scope of the qquestion.
What they have to do is to understand the system, classify, identify components, especially aiAI related ones. If aithe AI is in every poressurepressure cooker and they can't erase, reset or rebuild components - then not muchthey're out of luck for them.
If aithe AI is in some datacoredatacores, data center, or on neural chips - reset it, place it in chroota chroot virtual environment, make safequard aiaround the AI, different monitors etc - then harden your security, harden youyourself against rebellion.
It not necessarlynecessarily a 100% success, as you really need to go troughthrough all leacksleaks of intel (ifand if you can't......)
And there are options after options, scenarios after scenarios, variations after variations on how the situation can develop - the question does not provide enough information about situation and system and all that.
Maybe, they chip out aiAI datacore and most of other devices are operated by text commands idk, perhaps some JSON busAPIs, because founding fathers did forseeforesee the necessity of monitoring and be able read stuff there (real situation), be able to overwrite stuff from a calculator. Etc etc. And aithe AI even being evil, keeptkept it that way to remove suspicion and whatever other reason (there can be a list of those, valid ones).
mainMain points
Guys have to understand what they do - and use proper solution
youngYoung people may not know, but old - already do backups
factoryFactory reset is a thing even today, bring trash you. You can factotyfactory reset, for ai AI you can control (there are ways to do it rigth,right; just use dumber aisAIs, more of them etc)
itIt is possible to clean aiAI if you understand the system used, at least principlesin principle. AI can't emerge sporadically, we see that in efforts of todaystoday to make an aiAI work. So tresholdthe threshold for super evil, super smart aiAI is way higher than tech level you propose, and exceeds our current level. There are limits, there are conditions - it is not magic.
absenceAbsence of aiAI does not mean everything is good - viruses of today show that, so whatever hardware is left can be problematic. Some desync of actions may lead to problems naturally. Best one can do is to monitor for everything you can to detect abnormalities and be prepared to deal with the problems, fix them etc - detecting and understanding and cleaning system bit by bit.
inIn your question there is not enough information - it is possible to create situation and set resources available when your solution may be the only one, but it requires a lot more work on your side.
mostMost likely tech is tech of previous generation, or if most of it is lost then highest one they can get, chips from 80's-90-00-10-20-30, 90s, 00s, 10s, 20s ... 30s(?) - because the more you leave to be handled with already present components, which you didn't made, more there is places for potencial problempotential problems, for the aiAI black box situation as it is present in the qquestion. By lowering your tech for tapes (and really it not necessarlynecessarily easier than other solutions, satrunSaturn rocket engines are example - we can't make them today, but things are more interesting now) more you leave to be processed elswhereelsewhere, more things are out of your control.
Perfect situation is the same tech level, with factory reset equipment, or any hacked T100 options - make your own evil aiAI, which is evil against that original evil aiAI - if it can go wrong, make it go wrong in a rigthright way. (butBut learn your lessons really, there are safe ways to do AI!)
itIt not possible to ommitomit alternative solutions, because how superficial the qquestion is, it brings irresitableirresistible urge to bring some improvements for situation, everyone tries in a way they can.
ifIf you like that steampunk stuff (how it is called whatever) just do it, there is no reason for it, but just do. (Do not expect me to read/wahteverwhatever however, even if you pay, but it does not mean there aren't people with the same vibe) AI's and movies most books they sooso lost, even if there are good approaches, nobody uses them, lol. Evil aiThe 'Evil AI' trope is beyond repair.