Timeline for How can an armed group travel to and attack a rival group in another country?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2021 at 1:54 | vote | accept | FrontEnd | ||
| Jul 5, 2021 at 11:12 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | The spires of salisbury cathedral are quite lovely | |
| Jul 4, 2021 at 23:07 | comment | added | user_1818839 | @AlexP And perfume bottles. And they are admiring cathedrals. | |
| Jul 4, 2021 at 21:38 | comment | added | mishan | @user535733 I partially agree, but add "Or is happening in South America..." | |
| Jul 4, 2021 at 21:07 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jul 4, 2021 at 17:29 | answer | added | Willk | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 4, 2021 at 14:58 | answer | added | Nepene Nep | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 4, 2021 at 14:29 | answer | added | David R | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 4, 2021 at 13:34 | comment | added | user535733 | Armed conflict is both hugely expensive (hospital bills, legal fees) and very risky (death, agony, permanent disablement, imprisonment, enslavement). In order to have "battle" --more likely an ambush-- the rewards of victory must outweigh the cost and the risk. If there is lots of fighting going on, then your world has either greater rewards, or lower costs, or lower risk, and therefore cannot be "very similar to modern day today in every way" | |
| Jul 4, 2021 at 13:20 | comment | added | AlexP | ? They don't transport weapons and vehicles. They transport credit cards. (And if they insist on transporting weapons, then private aircraft are a real thing. No security. Or they could travel by boat or by car.) | |
| Jul 4, 2021 at 13:02 | history | asked | FrontEnd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |