Timeline for Could medieval age people have built a missile?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2018 at 12:59 | comment | added | TafT | Looking back at this I think rolling a log off a cliff or battlement might also count. It would certainly be an easy way to squash a number of people in one go. | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 7:48 | comment | added | TafT | I had not thought of them all being in ranks and we could just hit 10 people stood in multiple ranks as long as they are at least 10 deep. That would be an easier target to hit. | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 7:41 | comment | added | candied_orange | Since we're nit picking, you don't even need to attack from the side. If you attack an army in the field not only is there little need for fancy guidance.but everyone you hit is standing shoulder to shoulder, even if it's not with each other. | |
| S Jul 9, 2015 at 16:24 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling of "ballista", other minor fixes
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 16:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 9, 2015 at 16:24 | |||||
| Jul 9, 2015 at 13:54 | comment | added | Jon Hanna | Yep, but the flaw is with the question. It doesn't define missiles enough to exclude, well, missiles. | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 13:32 | comment | added | TafT | Defining a thing using its name is always iffy though. Even if you really mean the same word from another language. You are technically correct however, which as we have been taught, is the best form of correct. | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 13:15 | comment | added | Jon Hanna | For that matter, they were also called missiles, a word that's been in English since the early-modern period and derived from the classical Latin word, missile. | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 11:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 9, 2015 at 11:48 | |||||
| Jul 9, 2015 at 11:08 | history | answered | TafT | CC BY-SA 3.0 |