Timeline for How would a sci-fi matter replicator create a pressurised aerosol can?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 30, 2021 at 10:45 | comment | added | Mike Serfas | This is the sort of barbaric approach our ancestors might have momentarily considered, but be reasonable! The odor is generated by an ecosystem of complex life forms. A more civilized approach is to beam these life forms out, to be resettled via a network of long range transporters to specially ecoformed armpit planets where they can live fulfilling lives. | |
Apr 29, 2021 at 17:49 | comment | added | Michael Macha | @JustinThymetheSecond Going 3,000 light years from earth requires our best selves. We must always be dignified, of acceptable aroma and presentation, and... SHINY AND CHROME!!! | |
Apr 29, 2021 at 17:47 | comment | added | Michael Macha | 21st century... what kind of backwater primitives do you think we are? But yes, I was commenting on that on a response higher up—the vast majority of these deodorant features are workarounds for transportation and easy application, which the synthesizer itself makes kind of unnecessary and even inefficient. Imagine Not-Starfleet would even have a regulation against needless replicator abuse. | |
Apr 28, 2021 at 16:16 | comment | added | Justin Thyme the Second | Roll-on still has the 'yuck' factor from multiple re-use. Stick applicator less so, but it is there. I suspect it would be single-use pads. A sheet that is applied, and 'dissolves' on the skin, perhaps. 'Spray paint' would be different technology than our method as well - direct application by thousands of nanobots programmed to deposit packets of paint only on a specific surface, like powder coat. Once the product is delivered, the bots are recycled. No need for pressurization at all. Technopomorphosism meets anachronism. | |
Apr 28, 2021 at 15:30 | history | answered | Graham | CC BY-SA 4.0 |