Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 30, 2021 at 10:45 comment added Mike Serfas This is the sort of barbaric approach our ancestors might have momentarily considered, but be reasonable! The odor is generated by an ecosystem of complex life forms. A more civilized approach is to beam these life forms out, to be resettled via a network of long range transporters to specially ecoformed armpit planets where they can live fulfilling lives.
Apr 29, 2021 at 17:49 comment added Michael Macha @JustinThymetheSecond Going 3,000 light years from earth requires our best selves. We must always be dignified, of acceptable aroma and presentation, and... SHINY AND CHROME!!!
Apr 29, 2021 at 17:47 comment added Michael Macha 21st century... what kind of backwater primitives do you think we are? But yes, I was commenting on that on a response higher up—the vast majority of these deodorant features are workarounds for transportation and easy application, which the synthesizer itself makes kind of unnecessary and even inefficient. Imagine Not-Starfleet would even have a regulation against needless replicator abuse.
Apr 28, 2021 at 16:16 comment added Justin Thyme the Second Roll-on still has the 'yuck' factor from multiple re-use. Stick applicator less so, but it is there. I suspect it would be single-use pads. A sheet that is applied, and 'dissolves' on the skin, perhaps. 'Spray paint' would be different technology than our method as well - direct application by thousands of nanobots programmed to deposit packets of paint only on a specific surface, like powder coat. Once the product is delivered, the bots are recycled. No need for pressurization at all. Technopomorphosism meets anachronism.
Apr 28, 2021 at 15:30 history answered Graham CC BY-SA 4.0