Skip to main content
28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 24, 2021 at 6:58 vote accept The Infinite One
Jan 20, 2021 at 17:21 answer added user3067860 timeline score: 1
Jan 20, 2021 at 16:09 answer added The Faceguy timeline score: 1
Jan 20, 2021 at 10:17 comment added Tristan what exactly do you mean by "giant" warhammers? Because historical warhammers are actually pretty small, and for good reason
Jan 20, 2021 at 9:25 comment added Grimm The Opiner @RibhuHooja has it right - if you want a justification for a weapon that was never used in history, you need to invent an enemy for it to be used against. Either that or dial your giant hammers back to mere pollaxes, and have them fight men in full plate harness.
Jan 20, 2021 at 5:02 answer added nick012000 timeline score: 4
Jan 20, 2021 at 1:00 answer added Johnny timeline score: 4
Jan 19, 2021 at 23:45 comment added RBarryYoung The enemies are giant walnuts?
Jan 19, 2021 at 22:08 comment added RonJohn Why? Because "cool". That's the only justification needed.
Jan 19, 2021 at 21:01 history became hot network question
Jan 19, 2021 at 19:45 answer added Willk timeline score: 1
Jan 19, 2021 at 19:45 answer added SirTain timeline score: 17
Jan 19, 2021 at 17:19 answer added Alexander timeline score: 4
Jan 19, 2021 at 16:10 comment added puppetsock The enemy are moles! Thousands and thousands of moles! Whack! Whack! Whack whack!
Jan 19, 2021 at 15:50 answer added Alendyias timeline score: 1
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:33 comment added The Infinite One Yes, they were developed specifically to fight against an enemy empire that strongly prefers heavy armor in many units, and building fortifications. The size of the hammer also owes itself to the presence of enemy 'tank' cavalry, massive magically augmented warhorses that are heavily armored and carry heavily armored warriors, which most pikes break against
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:26 comment added VLAZ Just some quick thoughts - a warhammer regimen can definitely work. However, they would be very specialised and based on our history, not very effective. Not by themselves. Armies are not usually just one kind of troop, but a variety. A person with a warhammer and a person with a halberd can work a lot better together and handle more threats than just two people using one or the other. So, for a mono-warhammer strategy to make sense, you need a specific threat for it to handle.
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:21 history edited The Infinite One
edited tags
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:18 comment added The Infinite One Simply a permanent military unit. If there is a better word for it point it out please. Here I use it to differ it from temporary raised levies or personal retinues
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:18 comment added L.Dutch Sorry, but I find the combination of reality check and magic a bit odd.
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:17 history edited L.Dutch CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 28 characters in body
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:16 answer added L.Dutch timeline score: 12
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:10 comment added AlexP "The time period is medieval, pre-gunpowder": all right, but then what does the word regiment mean in this context? Regiments are post-medieval. (And anyway, the word has very meanings in different armies.)
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:09 comment added Ash Playing Zelda Breath Of the Wild I used to love the big hammer weapons and would often have them equipped by default. They were great for resource extraction - hit a shinny rock, get a gemstone. Hit a crate, get arrows and apples. Hit a moblin, send it flying. Swords couldn't do any of that.
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:08 history edited The Infinite One CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body; edited title
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:07 comment added The Infinite One no, hammers used for war. I capitalised them coz they're the proper noun name of the regiment, but now that you point it out maybe I should smallcase them
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:06 comment added Ash Warhammer - the existing 3rdParty World?
Jan 19, 2021 at 13:01 history asked The Infinite One CC BY-SA 4.0